<br>Unfortunately I was forced to re-join and then re-unsubscribe to finally debunk some neverdying MYTHS.<br><br><br>INTEL, IA32, i80686, AMD64 *is* *well* *supported* by OpenSXCE: Some run it on theit Netbook! - <br>OR: The ability to read a text and absorb information<br clear="all">
<br><br>I followed the discussion from the archives at <a href="http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2013-June/date.html">http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2013-June/date.html</a> and I'm shocked about all the nonsense that people can claim uncorrected, about what OpenSXCE is all about.<br>
I have always re-iterated all these technical aspects over and over again, when I was still on the Illumos and OI lists.<br>To me it looks as if few ever read even the subject line.<br><br>I also wrote all this to <a href="http://twitter.com/martinbochnig">twitter.com/martinbochnig</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/opensxce">twitter.com/opensxce</a>, <a href="http://facebook.com/opensxce">facebook.com/opensxce</a>, <a href="http://facebook.com/martinbochnig">facebook.com/martinbochnig</a>, OpenSXCE's blog <a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/</a> as well as to contributors in probably hundreds of private messages and skype calls, plus google chats.<br>
<br>It is a real mystery, why such NONSENSE can be claimed days-long without being corrected by or understood by the majority (BIG THANKS TO THE GOOD SOULS, who tried it) :<br><br>OpenSXCE is SPARC-only: WRONG<br>OpenSXCE is not based on Illumos: WRONG<br>
OpenSXCE will in the future not (indirektly) be based on Illumos modified OS/Net: WRONG<br>OpenSXCE is Desktop-only: WRONG<br>OpenSXCE is instable crap: WRONG<br>OpenSXCE has "no users": WRONG<br>Igor's DilOS.org OS/Net doesn't update itself to incorporate always the most recent stuff from Illumos (except where he has implemented things better, as you can read on his site or my blog) : WRONG<br>
MartinBochnig never works together with others: WRONG<br>MartinBochnig never writes technical details to these technical lists: WRONG<br><br><br>See my the OpenSXCE Blog, for example:<br><h3>OH “DilOS brings in the waffle cones” - Ken Mays / PLUS: *Hypocrisy*</h3>
<h3><a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/oh-dilos-brings-in-waffle-cones-ken.html" target="_blank">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/oh-dilos-brings-in-waffle-cones-ken.html</a><br>
</h3><br><br>DilOS-OS/Net: The more I learn from and about Igor, the more I have to
wonder why nobody ever put attention to him! But: He avoids fights.<br>
He rather writes code, code, code<br><br><a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/dilos-osnet-more-i-learn-from-and-about.html" target="_blank">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/dilos-osnet-more-i-learn-from-and-about.html</a><br>
<br><br><br>Will you ever notice, that x86/x64 is also supported?<br><br>what OpenSXCE actually is about: IA32, AMD64, sun4u, sun4v.<br>
You and everybody could read this from the beginning on (in bold letters: *COULD*).<br><br><h1>[OpenIndiana-discuss] A potential new Illumos reference distro candidate: IA32, AMD64, sun4u, sun4v</h1><a href="http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2012-December/010922.html" target="_blank">http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2012-December/010922.html</a><br clear="all">
<br><br>I do not bitch around because "nobody uses my distro", because - believe it or not: That's not the case.<br>I
simply think, that if somebody talks about me or my work, he should at
least have a clue, what he is talking about. And YES: I guess I do have
this humble right, as anybody has and should have.<br>
<br>If you (most at OI and Illumos) never read what I write, maybe it is easier to watch my x86 screenshots:<br><br><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/96825400@N05/sets/72157633874850547/" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/96825400@N05/sets/72157633874850547/</a><br>
<br><br><br><div>
To avoid ambiguity I should add: Although these pkgutil'ified SVR4 pkgs
can sit on any filesystem anf can be installed via file:// without
httpd, by default every user gets them from the cloud:</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<a href="http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/" target="_blank">http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/</a></div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
What do you say now?</div>
<div>
It works like IPS, only 3 times as quickly, plus without all these bugs, constraints and design flaws.</div>
<div>
</div><br><br>OpenSXCE 2013.05 x86 && x64 Screenshots <br><br><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/96825400@N05/sets/72157633874850547/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/96825400@N05/sets/72157633874850547/</a><br>
<br>Main Home (thanks to Ken Mays!) : <a href="http://opensxce.org/" target="_blank">http://opensxce.org/</a><br><br><a href="http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/" target="_blank">http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/</a><br>
<a href="http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/" target="_blank">http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/</a><br><br>BLOG: <a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/</a><br><br><h3 class="post-title entry-title">
OpenSXCE's benefits
of using DilOS.org's OS/Net over vanilla Illumos, as explained to us by
DilOS inventor, author and maintainer Igor Kozhukhov:
</h3><p><a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/opensxces-benefits-of-using-dilosorgs.html">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/opensxces-benefits-of-using-dilosorgs.html</a></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>A fair, open-minded discussion of the 3rd kind<br>
(OR: me explaining everything to a good man from behind the iron fence)<br>
</p><p><a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/a-fair-open-minded-discussion-of-3rd.html">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/a-fair-open-minded-discussion-of-3rd.html</a></p><p><br></p><br>DilOS-OS/Net: The more I learn from and about Igor, the more I have to
wonder why nobody ever put attention to him! But: He avoids fights.<br>
<br>
He rather writes code, code, code<br><br><a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/dilos-osnet-more-i-learn-from-and-about.html">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/dilos-osnet-more-i-learn-from-and-about.html</a><br>
<br><br><br><h3 class="post-title entry-title">UNBELIEVABLE: Nobody at OI nor Illumos seems to have ever read enough to figure out, OpenSXCE also supports x86:
</h3><a href="http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/unbelievable-nobody-at-oi-nor-illumos.html">http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/unbelievable-nobody-at-oi-nor-illumos.html</a><br><br><br><br><br> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/MartUXopensolaris" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/user/MartUXopensolaris</a><br>
<a href="https://twitter.com/MartinBochnig" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/MartinBochnig</a><br>
<br><br><br>And for the last time:<br><br><br><div>Some of you are that much deceitful and your words are that much full of
hypocrisy, I wonder why only few notice this, or rather: Dare to speak
it out. I have a lot of backers who say exactly the same, just not in
public.</div>
Look at my twitter acounts @martinbochnig and @opensxce. Only 2
folks have unsubscribed, and these are the ones that I
blocked unsubscribed myself first.<br><br><div>
To avoid ambiguity I should add: Although these pkgutil'ified SVR4 pkgs
can sit on any filesystem anf can be installed via file:// without
httpd, by default every user gets them from the cloud:</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<a href="http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/" target="_blank">http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/</a></div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
What do you say now?</div>
<div>
It works like IPS, only 3 times as quickly, plus without all these bugs, constraints and design flaws.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
LBNL: One of the reasons, why it does not have as many users as it could
have: NOBODY at Illumos ever made, nor intended to make any news
release to the more influental news wire channels, such as El Reg. Much
in contrast to the launch of OI in 2010.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Nobody should confuse reason and result.</div><br><br>Also about somebody's "He's a talented fellow no doubt, but building a distro and maintaining a
kernel are not in the same league"": I won't post his private message, just 2 parts: "The development of OI and IPS is none of my concern. I'm not a distro engineer.". Now my Q: Let alone moral, what gives him the _technical_ expertise then, to write something like this to world?!<br>
<br>2nd part of his reply: "fuck you!"<br><br>And my response: <br><pre>Garrett is only interested in rescuing his struggeling biz.<br><br></pre><div>You probably need a longer term perspective: It is hard if not
impossible to monetize this "community". Earlier or later commercial
involvement into OpenSolaris will have little chance of sustainability,
amortization. Look into the future: In 5 or 10 or 20 years, none of
these businesses will manage to survive in the extremely competitive
LinUX/UNIX market any longer. All that will survive is the true
community, compare it to *BSD.</div>
<div> </div><div>And the true community, unaffilliatd from any commercial interests, may use something like OpenSXCE2018.08 then.</div><br><br>Anyways, Good to know ...<br><br><pre>Who is "bitching around"?????<br>
I never used insulting language even remotely as insulting as "2 different leagues" or just now "fuck you".<br><br>Well, and do you know: I prefer girls ...<br><br><br><br><br><br></pre><div>
LBNL: One of the reasons, why it does not have as many users as it could
have: NOBODY at Illumos ever made, nor intended to make any news
release to the more influental news wire channels, such as El Reg. Much
in contrast to the launch of OI in 2010.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Nobody should confuse CAUSE and result.<br><br><br><br></div>respectfully and with full right disappointed <br><br>%martin bochnig<br><h1 id="yui_3_7_3_4_1370702118174_677" class="set-title"><br></h1><p><br></p><p><br></p>
<p><br></p><pre><br></pre>