<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:Courier New, courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div><span>Hello,</span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>Yikes!!</span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>Erol - Can you include the older zlib
1.2.3 libraries (32/64-bit ones) in the newer 'library/zlib@1.2.8,5.11-0.151.1.8.1:20130715T155558Z' package </span><span style="background-color: transparent;">in /hipster for backward compatibility with legacy apps?</span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>~ Ken</span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span> </span></div><div><br></div> <div style="font-family: 'Courier New', courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <div style="font-family: 'times
new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <hr size="1"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Erol Zavidic <erolms@gmail.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev@openindiana.org> <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev@openindiana.org> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, July 19, 2013 8:35 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [oi-dev] problem with firefox in hipster<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container"><br>Alex,<br><br>I bumped zlib this week so I have a bit of history here. All symbols from 1.2.3 versions have SUNW_1.2 label and newer are labeled with 1.3. <br>The 64bit calls were introduced after 1.2.3 and now carry 1.3 label, have a look at mapfile in zlib directory.
<br><br>Cheers,<br>Erol<br><br>Am 19.07.2013 um 12:53 schrieb Alexander Pyhalov <<a ymailto="mailto:alp@rsu.ru" href="mailto:alp@rsu.ru">alp@rsu.ru</a>>:<br><br>> On 07/19/2013 14:14, Nikola M. wrote:<br>>> On 07/19/13 12:06 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:<br>>>> On 07/19/2013 13:57, Jim Klimov wrote:<br>>>>> On 2013-07-19 11:51, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:<br>>>>> <br>>>>>>>> Maybe indeed a C++ incompatibility ?<br>>>>> <br>>>>>> Welcome to the world of binary incompatiblitly, now the last<br>>>>>> fortress has finally been conquered.....<br>>>>> <br>>>>> Which moves me to think: would this example mean that legacy<br>>>>> applications built for Solaris 10 and older, running now on<br>>>>> obsolete deployments which might be targeted for upgrade to<br>>>>> OI, would likely not run on
newer hipster-based GCC-compiled<br>>>>> OS releases?<br>> <br>>> Please don't try in Hipster, it is rolling release, hot even /dev.<br>>> Try latest OI /dev, saying 151a7 , that you can upgrade from opensolaris<br>>> 134, anyway.<br>> <br>> There is no longer opensolaris there. Migrated to FreeBSD in 2011 and rarely regret about this ;)<br>> <br>> About current problem - Andrzej identified the reason - zlib update. Need advices on fixing this.<br>> <br>> If we roll back zlib update, we need some ugly hack to update existing installations.<br>> The other idea is to identify incompatible changes and isolate them with symbol versioning. I have no idea if it is possible and how hard it is.<br>> -- <br>> Best regards,<br>> Alexander Pyhalov,<br>> system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>>
oi-dev mailing list<br>> <a ymailto="mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org" href="mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org">oi-dev@openindiana.org</a><br>> <a href="http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev" target="_blank">http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>oi-dev mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org" href="mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org">oi-dev@openindiana.org</a><br><a href="http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev" target="_blank">http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev</a><br><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>