<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/18/14 03:58 PM, ken mays via
oi-dev wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1411048704.81699.YahooMailNeo@web162201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial,
Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:10pt">><br class=""
style="" clear="none">
<div class="yahoo_quoted" style="display: block;">
<div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue,
Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size:
10pt;" class="">
<div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue,
Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size:
12pt;" class="">
<div class="" style="">> Or the difference exist
because I think CDDL forces treating files that <br
class="" style="" clear="none">
> change previous code as patches and you maybe say,
that treating files <br class="" style="" clear="none">
> that change existing code as patches is - optional?<br
class="" style="" clear="none">
<br class="" style="" clear="none">
If you add code in new files, it is fully optional to
the author whether the <br class="" style=""
clear="none">
new files are put under CDDL.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Yeah, but I focus more on changes then on new files. It is also more
sane to also add new files as CDDL. But patches, changes are
supposed to stay open and must be open to follow license.<br>
Adding new files licensed differently and not open is not accepted
in mainline open source projects, anyway.<br>
</body>
</html>