<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10819"><span>Hello,</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10777"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10777"><span>Yes.</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10777"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10777">As for any plugin wrapper issues with Flash:</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10777"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10769"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10771">The industry giants are pushing away from any 'official' Flash support in browsers and the legacy Flash plugins</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10488" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10487">for Solaris are now a potential security risk. This means any Flash plugin <= 11.2.x.x is now under UNOFFICIAL or FORBIDDEN (aka use only with care) use status when used on any Solaris/OpenSolaris-related OS platform during Internet use - especially in any business or academic environment.</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10488" dir="ltr"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10488" dir="ltr"><span>Thanks,</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10488" dir="ltr"><span>Ken</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10460"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1448556988331_10458"><br></div> <br><div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div dir="ltr"><font size="2" face="Arial"> On Thursday, November 26, 2015 11:33 AM, Alexander Pyhalov <alp@rsu.ru> wrote:<br></font></div> <br><br> <div class="y_msg_container">Hello.<br>I'd like to ask for your opinions. Thanks to Martin we have new FF <br>version <br>(<a href="https://github.com/pyhalov/oi-userland/tree/firefox/components/firefox" target="_blank">https://github.com/pyhalov/oi-userland/tree/firefox/components/firefox</a>).<br><br>There is one issue with new version:<br>- first of all, plugin wrapper sometimes crashes with Adobe Flash Player <br>10, it's not random, it crashes on some specific applications and <br>operations,<br>and it's a regression.<br><br>However, it's much more recent and has a lot of security fixes compared <br>to our FF. Also a lot of sites require fresh FF. Google docs started <br>complaining<br>about our FF version. I've tested icedtea plugin and it works with new <br>FF. Also Adobe Flash player 10 works with a lot of flash applications.<br>Shumway is supported by new FF, but it's not ideal, a lot of sites are <br>not supported. BTW, I've seen that several sites switched from flash to <br>HTML5<br>players with new FF.<br><br>So, the question is, should we update default OI Hipster FF to this <br>version? I'd say yes. What do you think?<br><br>-- <br>System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>oi-dev mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org" href="mailto:oi-dev@openindiana.org">oi-dev@openindiana.org</a><br><a href="http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev" target="_blank">http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev</a><br><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>