<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/ 9/16 01:09 AM, Aurélien Larcher
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHMq6q28smh-4fbh08b289-=KCHSSZxxZS7VJcyXAznLZy-zjA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:02 AM,
Nikola M <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:minikola@gmail.com" target="_blank">minikola@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br>
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class=""><br>
</span> It is about precising what is named what. <br>
Not looking what is active and how long and how.<br>
<br>
You can't call /dev past development releases a "Legacy"
since "Legacy" is reserved for /legacy and they are
Opensolaris dev. releases.<br>
<br>
It's not about what is active or, not, we all know only
OI hipster is currently active it is simple you can't
just decide to change /dev's name because you say so, <br>
because you create conflict of naming that creates
confusion for users and documentation.<br>
<br>
I don't find this humorous , I understand you recommend
that Openindiana development releases in /dev be called
"Vintage releases".<br>
I don't think that is more appropriate to call it "Old
Openindiana /dev development releases" and naming it wit
any new name including one you proposed, would create
confusion and disable /dev renewal.<span class=""><br>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>OK. The difference is between names and labels: labels
are moving targets.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You can't introduce any labels, because they collide with the name
as explained or are innacurate. Labels are not needed and are
confusing.<br>
<br>
Ok, so you will fix it to wording be "Old Openindiana development
releases" ?<br>
And you will fix it that there is no any "Devide" in Openindiana in
the past and now? <br>
That requires that your announcement be rewritten? <br>
What do you propose to be exact wording of an announcement then?<br>
<br>
I hope we don't need to put this to the vote, <br>
since it is obvious that /legacy exists and is in use and that
"Vintage" cna't be used for labeling, <br>
because it hurts proposed /dev repository renewal project. <br>
<br>
</body>
</html>