<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/28/17 03:29 PM, Aurélien Larcher
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHMq6q34+JRBT8VUg_fHD_sm20a4DZz4Bpp0JZrvCHz14z9WQw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><span class="gmail-"></span><span class="gmail-"></span><span
class="gmail-"></span><br>
<span class="gmail-"></span><span class="gmail-"></span>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">I know the Wiki is a sensitive topic
for you but please play nice in your answers.<br>
<div>Especially since James' comments are valid.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Bug reports should be put on Bug tracker.<br>
Comments are actually solved by making an account, and witout
"flaging" on the wiki, that is trolling, but changing articles.<br>
<br>
It is important to have nice Wiki, but as I see you apply too many
wrong assumptions and wrong actions to positively attract people .<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAHMq6q34+JRBT8VUg_fHD_sm20a4DZz4Bpp0JZrvCHz14z9WQw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If the content is outdated, flag it as such, if it is
completely irrelevant move it to the archive folder.<br>
</div>
<div>Of course discussing such modifications beforehand is
appreciated.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
"Flag " is form of trolling as time consumed for "flag" is almost
equal to time needed to read and directly instantly change what is
needed.<br>
<br>
No flag is needed, nor should be used. One can directly change
articles and I won't repeat that anymore since it is just obvious
you are wrong.<br>
<br>
One can say that one Makes content outdated (what exactly is?)
simply by flagging it and not updating it.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>