[OpenIndiana-discuss] Problems with ZFS ACL vs 'normal' ACL
sardonic.smiles at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 00:21:47 UTC 2012
Well, since there's no NFS and nothing I can think of that would bung up 8
different file systems in their entirety I'm not sure what else to do,
other than scripting a fix to run every so often. That seems very ugly and
is completely ungraceful, so I'd like to avoid it if possible.
My UNIX is not so much, so I'm not sure how to, or if I even can, monitor
the ACL to see when it's changed and by what process. But if someone can
point me in the right direction to figure that out, I can hopefully prevent
it from happening in the future.
However, if ACLmode is set to discard, shouldn't the ZFS ACL be ignored and
only the POSIX (right?) one be consulted for access permissions?
On Apr 9, 2012 8:10 PM, "Gordon Ross" <gordon.w.ross at gmail.com> wrote:
> meaning, smashed, the only ACE being the @owner one.
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross at gmail.com>
> > FYI, I asked about NFS (any version) and local processes because,
> > with aclmode=discard, you can easily find an innocent chmod() call
> > that leaves your ACL looking the way you found it.
> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Richard Elling
> > <richard.elling at richardelling.com> wrote:
> >> On Apr 9, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Martin Frost wrote:
> >>> Is there some issue with sharing via both SMB/CIFS and NFS?
> >> NFSv3 does not have ACLs. NFSv4 does have ACLs. So there is not a
> >> problem with NFS, per se, but the version your clients use might not
> >> understand ACLs.
> >> -- richard
> >> --
> >> ZFS Performance and Training
> >> Richard.Elling at RichardElling.com
> >> +1-760-896-4422
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> >> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss