[OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance

[bentahyr at chez.com]

Thanks for the FAT trick.
I don't remember when the disk used to be NTFS, 1 or 2 years ago. I had to reformat it for compatibility issues with shiny hardware I don't manage.

I'll try to reformat it to NTFS and see how it goes.

Best regards.
Ben

----- Mail original -----
De: "Aurélien Larcher" <aurelien.larcher at gmail.com>
À: openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 16:08:25
Objet: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance

I guess it depends which filesystem you are using, but for FAT yes definitely.
Maybe just a matter of block size in this case.
Also make sure that USB2 is actually used, I found Solaris/illumos to fallback to USB1 on several occasions.

Aurélien

À lun. juil. 27 06:00:21 2015 GMT+0200, bentahyr at chez.com a écrit :
> I redid the test, it is more around 30-35 MB/s on other OS's actually.
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: bentahyr at chez.com
> À: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" <openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org>
> Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 15:56:33
> Objet: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB 2 performance
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I always found the performance of USB devices connected to OI behind other OS.
> Is it related to the implementation or is it just me (oi159a) ?
> 
> For example, same drive transfer (one big file) is :
> - 8MB/s on OI
> - 45MB/s on Linux/Windows
> 
> Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss