[oi-dev] review: gcc as primary compiler
Igor Kozhukhov
ikozhukhov at gmail.com
Mon Feb 13 11:40:09 UTC 2012
About GNU_ARCH - it is not for this review and not changed.
It is value is using for GCC builds.
This review about changes to GCC as primary compiler.
About copyright - they are no changes in copyright on this change set.
I'll update copyright info for next components.
It is big chanegset and can we applied to illumos-userland, if all will
agree.
-Igor
From: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont at gmail.com>
Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev at openindiana.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:24:13 +0000
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev at openindiana.org>
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] review: gcc as primary compiler
> Hi Igor,
>
> I've only had a quick scan through the changes but I'd say on the whole they
> look to be an improvement over what we currently have. However, there are two
> things I think you need to look at: 1) You still have some things that are
> copyright yourself 2) You do not seem to set GNU_ARCH but you are passing it
> in PKG_MACROS for at least one package.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> From: Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev at openindiana.org>
> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:52:55 +0400
> To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev at openindiana.org>
> Subject: Re: [oi-dev] review: gcc as primary compiler
>
> At this moment illumos-userland - it is fork of dilos-userland - changes will
> be updated correctly.
>
> dilos-userland - it is public repo, not a private.
>
> -Igor
>
> From: Bayard Bell <buffer.g.overflow at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev at openindiana.org>
> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:42:43 +0000
> To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <oi-dev at openindiana.org>
> Subject: Re: [oi-dev] review: gcc as primary compiler
>
>> As this is also a policy issue, let's finalize this at #oi-meeting.
>>
>> Also, could we please submit changes to userland via forks of the public
>> illumos-userland or oi-build (with the roll-out of illumos-userland under
>> discussion at the next #oi-meeting, one item should be working off it alone
>> going forward)? Using a fork of a private repo that may or may not diverge
>> substantially from what everyone else is using makes it harder for people to
>> evaluate.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Igor Kozhukhov <ikozhukhov at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> Please review:
>>>> https://bitbucket.org/dilos/dilos-userland/changeset/5e3079f6ad40
>>>>
>>>> https://www.illumos.org/issues/2113
>>>> It is big changeset with changes for "setup GCC as default compiler"
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Igor Kozhukhov
>>>> IRC# igork
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.orghttp://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
> _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.orghttp://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
> _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20120213/e0c90d64/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the oi-dev
mailing list