[oi-dev] Bumping zlib to 1.2.8

[Erol Zavidic]

Hi Andy,

you are probably right with the versioning, it might produce quite some
compatibility issues among different Illumos distros if we share codebase.
Same applies to Solaris though code sharing is probably not likely to
happen. :-)

@Andrzej, Adam, Ken, Alex, et al: what do you recommend here? Setup own
Illumos shared library symbol versioning for newer things than already
present in the repo?

Cheers,
Erol



On 15 July 2013 16:59, Andy Stormont <andyjstormont at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Erol,
>
> I ask because if it's not taken from an Oracle update then it might be
> better to use something else, like ILLUMOS_1.0.  Otherwise you may end up
> with a SUN_1.3 version table that doesn't match up with what Oracle are
> shipping.  May or may not be a big deal - depends how much you care about
> compatibility with Solaris 11 - if at all.
>
> Andy.
>
> On 15 Jul 2013, at 15:39, Erol Zavidic <erolms at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> SUNW_1.3 is an incremental increase for the new symbols that came after
> the latest released version (1.2.3). Upstream userland still carries 1.2.3
> and ec-userland is with zlib without symbols.
>
> Cheers,
> Erol
>
>
> On 15 July 2013 15:58, Andy Stormont <andyjstormont at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> mapfile changes look good, but where did the SUNW_1.3 version come from?
>>
>> Andy.
>>
>> On 15 Jul 2013, at 14:53, ken mays <maybird1776 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Erol,
>>
>> Your build and patches now look good for zlib-1.2.8 migration to /hipster.
>>
>> Be aware of the changes needed for:
>>
>> SUNWzlib at 1.2.3,5.11-0.133:20130305T140733Z
>> consolidation/sfw/sfw-incorporation at 0.5.11
>> ,5.11-0.151.1.8:20130305T142156Z
>>
>> Just so nothing slips through the cracks during the migration - once
>> approved.
>>
>> ~ Ken Mays
>>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>  *From:* Erol Zavidic <erolms at gmail.com>
>> *To:* oi-dev <oi-dev at openindiana.org>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 15, 2013 9:32 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [oi-dev] Bumping zlib to 1.2.8
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> another try to bump zlib to v1.2.8, this time with symbols in libraries.
>>
>> Here's the diff:
>> https://github.com/erolms/oi-userland/compare/zlib_v2?expand=1
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Erol
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2013 20:33, Erol Zavidic <erolms at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I bumped zlib to the latest version. The update should be backwards
>> compatible, but dependency list is long and something might break. Need
>> your assistance here.
>> One of the issues that has to be resolved _before_ updating zlib is to
>> update libxml2 to a version higher that 2.7.6. In 2.7.6 there is a nasty
>> bug, fiddling with zlib internal structures, causing libxml2 coredump with
>> newer zlib versions. I will look into libxml2 recipe later on/tomorrow.
>>
>> Here's the diff for review, please comment. Thx.
>> https://github.com/erolms/oi-userland/compare/zlib
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Erol
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20130716/afa4beba/attachment-0005.html>