[oi-dev] Thunderbird 38.4.0 integration

[Мартин Бохниг]

 Hi Ken, all, 

I'm glad to help with this.
But PLEASE: Only after I finished my legal letters to the court and lawyers.

Translated into days this means after Wednesday.

btw. why such an older 30.x release?
If you want we can get this going on 40.x, after Wed.
Now that we have the FF port this should be possible in 1 or 2 days (rather one), to update the difs themselves.



TNX RGDS, %m


>Воскресенье, 29 ноября 2015, 16:45 +03:00 от Мартин Бохниг <opensxce at mail.ru>:
>
>
>>Воскресенье, 29 ноября 2015, 13:21 UTC от ken mays via oi-dev < oi-dev at openindiana.org >:
>>
>>For those wanting to update to Thunderbird 38.4.0esr, we are now reviewing patches for oi-hipster integration:
>>
>>https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/tree/oi/hipster/components/thI did not take the time to compare them, sounderbird
>>
>>Source:  http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/releases/38.4.0/source/thunderbird-38.4.0.source.tar.bz2
>>
>>~ Ken
>
>
>Hi Ken,
>
>
>good work, but is it correct that I can only see patches for 24.2 and 31.7.0 which are normaly highly (too much) Studio-specific becaus Oracle only uses Studio for everything now (while Sun at least maintained a status from 2006 to its end)?
>Ok, but on the other hand - when speaking about what I know - it is true, that older FF diffs from were also still gcc buildable until release 24. This changed at about version 31++ (I used them only as reference, every time the build failed).
>So sun-audio is in, too - as I see at first glimpse. Good. Because why depending on something else while we already have the same.
>Oracle however meanwhile ships lib pulseaudio as I noticed over last week when performing KMS testing on Sol11.3.
>But for what?
>
>Thunderbird: I never re-compiled TB since Mai 2014, and never cared much about it (in contrast to the relative and libxul-brother FF).
>Does it on TB not lead to gcc visibility errors when linking libxul.so
>(because the sun-ld does not understand gcc's visibility when dealing with assembly code in *.s files)?
>
>I may not understand what's asked for at the moment.
>Are you looking for reviewers of 38.x diffs or for someone who brings them over from 31 to 38?
>If the former, where must I look to find them?
>
>Although, no time at the moement.
>So pls. someone else.
>
>
>%martin
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>oi-dev mailing list
>oi-dev at openindiana.org
>http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20151129/a137a915/attachment-0005.html>