[oi-dev] OpenIndiana Code of Conduct

[Adam Števko]

Hello,

any more comments on this?

http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals <http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals> - Modified proposed version
http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953 <http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953> - Nikola’s version

Cheers,
Adam

> On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:47 AM, Aurélien Larcher <aurelien.larcher at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> À mar. juil. 26 20:49:56 2016 GMT+0100, Michael Kruger a écrit :
>> On 07/26/2016 09:58 AM, WebDawg wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> For instance in this response:
>>> 
>>> "No unfinished half-things should be put on site like this."
>>> 
>>> Is this a decision that needs decided still? Is there a consensus in any
>>> direction that  http://www.openindiana.org/community/ is for drafts or
>>> not for drafts?  I get that the support docs had a new complete format
>>> and required possibly a different type of server but this stuff is just
>>> text.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I also like mailing lists and hate wiki talk pages.
>> 
>> 
>> Hi WebDawg,
>> 
>> I am not aware of a formally established process for submitting draft
>> documents for consideration. For the purpose of discussing such a
>> document, conceivably, it could have been hosted anywhere (www, wiki,
>> google docs, github gist, etc.), or not hosted at all (e.g. the entire
>> text sent as a post to the mailing list).
>> 
>> As I understood it, the original idea was for people to view the
>> document and submit comments via the mailing list.
>> 
>> I don't believe it was ever intended for anyone but the original authors
>> to directly edit the document as hosted on the www site.
> 
> Indeed, the website being intended for publication only, the initial proposal was meant to serve as reference for discussion on the mailing list first.
> 
> Editable versions on other media (like the wiki) from the discussion could be then created as the discussion moved forward.
> 
> But in any case, the reference should still be available and unmodified so that any participant can evaluate the differences/improvements.
> 
> Basically ... what Michael said.
> 
>> 
>> As for alternate proposals, comments, etc., they could have been
>> delivered in any form (IRC, mailing list, github gist, etc).
>> 
>> The need to provide an editable version of the document to be directly
>> edited by community members wasn't (I don't believe) ever considered.
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org <mailto:oi-dev at openindiana.org>
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev <http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev>
>> 
> 
> --
> Thanks for sailing Jolla :)
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org <mailto:oi-dev at openindiana.org>
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev <http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20160801/fd25dd65/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20160801/fd25dd65/attachment-0004.bin>