[oi-dev] OpenIndiana Code of Conduct

[Aurélien Larcher]

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:13 PM, WebDawg <webdawg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Adam Števko <adam.stevko at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> any more comments on this?
>>
>> http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals - Modified
>> proposed version
>> http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953 -
>> Nikola’s version
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adam
>>
>>
>
> Do you really want a group of people assigned to disciplining people, in the
> dark?  How about anonymous complaints, but on an open forum?  There should
> be a POC to complain, but if you want the project to be 'open' should not
> every thing be open?
>
>
> I would combine this:
>
> Give them the time you were given when you first joined the community.
> And if you weren't given enough time please set a new example for others to
> live by.
>
> Give them the time you were given when you first joined the community;  even
> if you weren't given enough time please set a new example for others to live
> by.
>
>
> If you want a sub bullet to this, this may be better:
>
> Be open and transparent so others can participate on an equal footing and
> contribute to the project in their own way.
>
> This is an OPEN project.  Everyone has something to contribute!
>
>
> Repeated complaining (rehashing) of closed (decided) issues.
>
> I would just remove the word complaining....
>
> Repeated rehashing of closed/decided issues.
>
> What do you really mean by this?:
>
>
> Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a
> pattern of behavior which could be considered harassment.
>
> I was at a hackerspace once and I asked a lot of questions, this could be
> considered harassment.  Do you mean bullying??
>
> Nikola's seems similar to what is already there for the first section.  The
> second two are different.
>
> Does OpenIndiana have anything like this?:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Linux#Principles
>
> If you are introducing someone to a code of conduct I think it would be very
> important to introduce them to the rules under the hood and also give them
> links on ways to contribute.

The links to contribute were the ones posted by Adam.


>
> I have also received no reply on the wiki vs website.  I have not also
> received any information on if the Openindiana documentation project is
> still alive/moving forward.

<snip>
Can someone tell me which wiki/web page we are supposed to be looking at?

http://www.openindiana.org/community/code-of-conduct/

-> reference document published for proposal, not editable.
-> work on drafts happens on the Wiki as described on the webpage.

http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals

-> work in progress draft based on Adam and Michael's proposal

http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953

-> work in progress draft based on Nikola's proposal

</snip>

Originally both versions were presented together on one page but
Nikola preferred to have them separated.


>
> It would suck to see the project documentation/content split between site
> and wiki, everything would be so confusing.  Don't you guys want to work
> something out on this note?

The Wiki and Docs website serve two different purposes:
- the Wiki is for developer's notes which are by definition moving
targets: these notes can be the basis of new content for the end user
documentation.
- the Docs website is for user documentation and should be fed with
content by pull-requests. This solution makes it possible to deploy
the documentation (e.g. Handbook) in various formats which is
impossible with the Wiki.


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev



-- 
---
Praise the Caffeine embeddings