[oi-dev] Why are Firefox and Thunderbird built with jemalloc?

Aurélien Larcher aurelien.larcher at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 21:45:00 UTC 2017


On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <
bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
>
>> This is just a simple and honest question.
>>> I have rebuilt Firefox and Thunderbird with jemalloc disabled and linked
>>> to libumem.
>>> I am not sure if the behaviour is related to adjusting
>>> layout.frame_rate=24 or the memory alloc but Thunderbird seems less
>>> "bloated".
>>> Any experience?
>>>
>>
>> (the underlying question being about memory fragmentation and such)
>>
>
> Libumem has been significantly improved after the fork from OpenSolaris.
> It seems more optimized for speed than for memory efficiency.
>
> It would be good to test with umem and without to see how well it actually
> works.
>

Would getting statistics from ::umastat periodically be something worth
looking at?


>
> Bob
> --
> Bob Friesenhahn
> bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
> GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>



-- 
---
Praise the Caffeine embeddings
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20170222/51c93e0d/attachment-0005.html>


More information about the oi-dev mailing list