[oi-dev] Slow Loader on Samsung 950 Pro

[Till Wegmüller]

Hi Toomas

The system was installed two weeks ago and updated about one week ago.
What I noticed when booting is:
The first spinner already akes a couple of seconds to load loader wheras
on the iso it takes at most one second.

What takes most time is Display of available memory after displaying the
seem bios drives.

Loading things like the string class is fast as expected.
Loading menu config and boot_archive from disk is what takes most time.

Your dev version of loader gets as far as printing the system bios
drives on white background and then stops.

Loader on Hipster takes some time to print the bios memory then it
continious.

Loader from your dev link also sees a fd device which current stable
loader does not. I have no Floppy disk device in that computer.

Does this help?
Greetings
Till


On 09/24/18 02:55 PM, Toomas Soome via oi-dev wrote:
> Forgot to note, you should also be able to boot usb/iso, press esc from menu. Then use beadm list zfs:rpool and beadm activate zfs:rpool and then enter boot
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 15:40, Toomas Soome via oi-dev <oi-dev at openindiana.org> wrote:
>>
>> Installed or pkg update is also done?
>>
>> I am on the trip this week and can not help with code, but from http://148.52.235.80.sta.estpak.ee you can find iso/usb image, and from it you can copy the dev version of loader binary. You can copy it with new name and if you press the space just when the first spinner, you can enter the new name.
>>
>> Basically I’d like to establish if the error is actually fixed...
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 15:18, Till Wegmüller <toasterson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Setup is most recent Hipster installed two weeks ago.
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>> Till
>>>> On 9/24/18 1:44 PM, Toomas Soome via oi-dev wrote:
>>>> What version, or how old is the setup? The older ones had some cases where the read past disk end and with some systems this can cause slowdown as described.
>>>>
>>>> Rgds,
>>>> Toomas
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 13:03, Till Wegmüller <toasterson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anybody tested loader on an NVME Disk? I have two Samsung 950 Pro in
>>>>> a mirror Zpool Configuration. They are nicely fast but not during boot.
>>>>> To be more precise loader requires more than 20minutes to get to the
>>>>> point at which it has loaded the kernel and Ramdisk into memory. From
>>>>> there the Kernel requires about 10-20 seconds to boot to graphical desktop.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to start debugging that issue. Where can I start?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and Greetings
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>