[oi-dev] valgrind and epoll(5) illumos issue

Vincent Torri vincent.torri at gmail.com
Sun Apr 11 07:27:08 UTC 2021


On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 8:33 AM stes at PANDORA.BE <stes at telenet.be> wrote:
>
>
> I wonder whether there are many packages using epoll at all.

I know that Enlightenment is using epoll. Aurelien will have more
informations about this.

regards

Vincent Torri


> I happen to see this now because the configure script of squeak-5,
> finds /usr/include/sys/epoll.h and enables it.
>
> And it works.  Also if you compile some of the sample epoll servers on the internet,
> such as:
>
> https://gist.github.com/reterVision/8300781
>
> copy paste to sample-epoll.c and compile it , it works and if you run it under valgrind,
> you can reproduce the problem easily.
>
> The valgrind source code has a syswrap-linux.c file,
> which supports epoll and epoll_ctl as linux specific calls.
>
> So I could copy/paste the code from syswrap-linux.c and use it in syswrap-solaris.c.
>
> However does OpenIndiana really have to ship /usr/include/sys/epoll.h ?
>
> The sys/epoll.h header file could be split from SUNWcs package,
> and provided in an optional header file package for epoll compatibility.
>
> There are some implications to shipping the header file sys/epoll.h by default.
>
> Also the docs (manpage) itself of illumos is a little bit sceptical or critical of epoll.
>
> It writes :
>
> .  In particular, the Linux epoll facility will -- by design
>        -- continue to generate events for closed file descriptors where/when the
>        underlying file description remains open.  For example, if one were to
>        fork(2) and
>
> https://illumos.org/man/5/epoll
>
> I can add that this seems to be happening in the Smalltalk community,
> and that the Smalltalk developer who added epoll support is working on a solution for that,
> which hits all platforms that use epoll.
>
>
> So I'm not 100% sure using epoll is a good idea, although it is an interesting improvement.
>
>
> Also is it a decision of OpenIndiana to support epoll or could OpenIndiana just remove/split that part from Illumos,
> and make it optional ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev



More information about the oi-dev mailing list