[oi-dev] What changed between glib versions?

Stephan Althaus Stephan.Althaus at Duedinghausen.eu
Fri Apr 1 21:24:40 UTC 2022


On 4/1/22 19:48, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
>
> Am 4/1/22 um 19:42 schrieb stes at PANDORA.BE:
>> In this case the '0.0.1' in "glib2 at 2.70.0,5.11-2022.0.0.1" is important.
>>
>> I guess there are users who expect USB keyboard and mouse hotplug to 
>> work
>> or USB storage automount so for those users it be an unpleasant 
>> experience of OpenIndiana if that does not work.
>>
>>  From that perspective it may make sense to stay on glib 2.62 as long 
>> as this complex issue is not further debugged or understood.
>
> You are right, but we need people working on it.
>
> At the moment I am fighting with many problems, like we cannot build
> firefox or thunderbird anymore for unknown reasons (also on my build
> systems).
> More important, the build server is not able to successfully build
> illiumos-gate packages anymore. It stopped recently. This is local to
> our build server,
> because I can successfully build the illumos-gate packages.
>
> An finally the distribution constructor on the build server hasn't been
> able to produce working media. I successfully build media in February,
> but my March attempts all fail.
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> David Stes
>>
>> ----- Op 1 apr 2022 om 19:34 schreef Andreas Wacknitz A.Wacknitz at gmx.de:
>>
>>> Am 01.04.22 um 19:31 schrieb stes at PANDORA.BE:
>>>> So this new upgrade is again in fact a downgrade or regression to
>>>>
>>>> https://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.62/glib-2.62.6.tar.xz
>>>>
>>>> In any case now the rmvolmgr rmmount seems to work (again) for me ...
>>> Yes, I downgraded it again after your report. Also my system didn't 
>>> work
>>> anymore as expected after the latest illumos-gate updates.
>>> As I have stated in another mail, I also have problems with this
>>> version, only less often.
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> David Stes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Op 1 apr 2022 om 19:25 schreef Andreas Wacknitz 
>>>> A.Wacknitz at gmx.de:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 01.04.22 um 19:00 schrieb stes at PANDORA.BE:
>>>>>> Good news ! I can update https://www.illumos.org/issues/14226 
>>>>>> again ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But this time to report success.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There was an update of "media-volume-manager" which now has glib2 
>>>>>> 2.70 as a
>>>>>> require.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # rmmount -l and # eject -l  report the removable media.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just tried to insert a USB key in my system and it automounts 
>>>>>> immediately on
>>>>>> my OI workstation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # pkg list media-volume-manager hal glib2 dbus
>>>>>> NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION                    IFO
>>>>>> library/glib2 2.70.0-2022.0.0.1          i--
>>>>> This is the fake glib-2.70.0 version. You can check it with pkg info
>>>>> glib2. It will show you which sources have been used to create it...
>>>>>
>>>>>> service/hal 0.5.11-2022.0.0.21026      i--
>>>>>> service/storage/media-volume-manager 0.5.11-2022.0.0.21026      i--
>>>>>> system/library/dbus 1.12.20-2020.0.1.1         i--
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # pkg contents -t depend media-volume-manager
>>>>>> TYPE    FMRI
>>>>>> require pkg:/system/library/libdbus-glib at 0.112-2022.0.0.0
>>>>>> require pkg:/shell/ksh93 at 93.21.1.20120801-2022.0.0.21026
>>>>>> require pkg:/library/glib2 at 2.70.0-2022.0.0.0
>>>>>> require pkg:/SUNWcs at 0.5.11-2022.0.0.21026
>>>>>> require pkg:/service/hal at 0.5.11-2022.0.0.21026
>>>>>> require pkg:/system/library/libdbus at 1.12.20-2020.0.1.1
>>>>>> require pkg:/service/storage/removable-media at 0.5.11-2022.0.0.21026
>>>>>> require pkg:/system/library at 0.5.11-2022.0.0.21026
>>>>>> require pkg:/system/library/dbus at 1.12.20-2020.0.1.1
>>>>>> require consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps some of the packages involved  (I suspect 
>>>>>> "media-volume-manager") was
>>>>>> not the right version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When debugging this there seems to be a command :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       dbus-monitor --session
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that can be used to follow what is going on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> David Stes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>>>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Hi!

I have a local problem on my more recently updated machines not showing 
"developer/java/jdk" - my older machine does list this package.

Maybe this symptom is related to the build problems ?

Otherwise ignore this..


steven at dell6510:~$ pkg list |grep jdk
developer/java/openjdk7 (openindiana.org) 1.7.141-2020.0.1.4         i--
developer/java/openjdk8 (openindiana.org) 1.8.232-2020.0.1.2         i--
runtime/java/openjdk7 (openindiana.org) 1.7.141-2020.0.1.4         i--
runtime/java/openjdk8 (openindiana.org) 1.8.232-2020.0.1.2         i--

steven at dell6510:~$ sudo pkg install developer/java/jdk
Password:
No updates necessary for this image.

???

steven at oi:~$ pkg list|grep jdk
developer/java/jdk 0.5.11-2017.0.0.0          i-r
developer/java/openjdk8 1.8.232-2020.0.1.2         i--
runtime/java/openjdk7 1.7.141-2020.0.1.4         i--
runtime/java/openjdk8 1.8.232-2020.0.1.2         i--

Greetings,

Stephan





More information about the oi-dev mailing list