[oi-dev] rrdtool update questions
Klaus Ziegler
klausz at haus-gisela.de
Tue Jan 11 19:51:49 UTC 2022
Hi Fritz,
this publish error can be fixed in:
.../oi-userland/tools/python/pkglint:
@@ -333,8 +333,6 @@
if bits == 32 and path64:
result = _("32-bit object '%s' in 64-bit path")
- elif bits == 64 and not path64:
- result = _("64-bit object '%s' in 32-bit path")
return result
def file_action(self, action, manifest, engine, pkglint_id="001"):
@Andreas,
perhaps we should make this the default, as we anyway move forward
to migrate more and more apps/libs/tool to be only 64bit, what di you
think?
Many Regards
Klaus
On 1/11/22 18:10, Friedrich Kink via oi-dev wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> based on Andreas' comment I rebuild rrdtool exclusively 2for 64-bit.
> This added also support for all bindings lua, tcl, perl, ruby (v2.6)
> and pyhton (v3.7). Though python created some headache. It build needs
> an ugly tweak of the configure script to find the right header files.
> The issue is cause by /usr/include/pyhton3.7*m. *Both version
> python3.7 and pyhton3.7m reports back PYTHON_VERSION 3.7. Based on
> this return the PYTHON_INCLUDES is always created as
> /usr/include/pyhton3.7 which does not exist. Is this intentional (the
> real path is /usr/include/pyhton3.7m, just a warmup question ;-). But
> the real problem I have with this python binding is this error when
> publishing:
>
> /usr/bin/python3.5 /usr/bin/pkglint \
> -f /usr/share/src/myoi-userland/tools/pkglintrc
> /usr/src/myoi-userland/components/image/rrdtool/build/manifest-i386-rrdtool.depend.res
> Lint engine setup...
> Starting lint run...
> ERROR userland.action001.2 64-bit object
> 'usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/rrdtool.cpython-37m.so' in 32-bit path
> WARNING pkglint.action005.1 obsolete dependency check skipped:
> unable to find dependency
> pkg:/image/library/libpng16 at 1.6.37-2020.0.1.0 for
> pkg:/image/rrdtool at 1.7.2,5.11-2022.0.0.0
>
> Is there a way to overcome this problem or should i just remove the
> python3.7 binding (basically all pathon3.x versions)? BTW phyton2.7
> would work without problem including publishing but I didn't want to
> create a dependency to this soon to be deprecated/removed version.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Fritz
>
> PS: What about failing tests? Are they just to be reported or should I
> try to fix them?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
--
Klaus Ziegler Tel: (++49 6105) 968846
Zeppelinstrasse 3 Mobil: (++49 172) 3064445
D-64546 Walldorf-Moerfeldenmailto:klausz at haus-gisela.de
\\\
(.. )
=o00=(_)=00o=============================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20220111/d647eece/attachment.html>
More information about the oi-dev
mailing list