[oi-dev] inkscape calls gcc7 and 10

[Udo Grabowski (IMK)]

On 12/07/2023 15:04, Stephan Althaus wrote:
> On 7/7/23 19:07, Till Wegmüller wrote:
>> On 07.07.23 07:20, Tim Mooney via oi-dev wrote:
>>
>> > The old all-in-one source is no longer a thing, so if we build from
>> > released tarballs, we'll potentially need to fetch and extract multiple
>> > components.
>>
>> That has been done before and one component can handle multiple sources. Worst
>> case one can use a shellscript to handle the download and placing of all sources.
>>
>>> 1) lib2geom is required, but it could be built and packaged separately.
>>> Nothing else (other than inkscape) that I'm aware of uses it currently.
>>>
>>> Would it be preferable to have it as a separate package, or just build it
>>> and package it in the same package as inkscape?
>> lib2geom would be preferable seperate. Just because it's the first consumer it
>> wont mean it's the last.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 2) some of the extensions require low-use libraries, like the 'libwpd'
>>> that Udo mentioned.
>>>
>>> Should the inkscape extensions that require these esoteric libraries be
>>> split into separate packages, so 'image/inkscape' has fewer dependencies,
>>> but 'image/inkscape/extension/wordperfect' (or whatever) can optionally
>>> be installed to get support for that legacy format?
>>
>> Yes spilitting things up is a good idea. A base set can always be bundled via
>> requirements via a meta package.
>>
>>>
>>> Next, 1.2.2 actually builds without *any* of the local patches, though I still
>>> need to look through them to see if there are any OI-customization patches
>>> that we still need.
>>>
>>> Many of the existing patches are for math library functions like
>>> log(), sin(), pow(), etc. where integers rather than doubles were being
>>> passed.  I can update these so they apply to 1.2.2, but they seem to be
>>> no longer required (probably because of gcc/g++ 10.x).
>>
>> With int -> double convertions it is simply a build issue.
>>
>>>
>>> Question:
>>>
>>> 3) is it worth updating these patches, if they're not needed to actually
>>> build any more?  I'm tempted to say no, but I'm willing to update them
>>> if Andreas or others have strong feelings about keeping as many > possible.
>>
>> As Udo mentioned runtime is most problematic.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>
> Hello!
>
> if i do a
>
> find ../../ -name pkg5 -exec grep -nH "gcc-7-runtime" {} \;|wc
>
> in the source tree i get 86 lines..
>
> Maybe we could start with the libs these are only 30..
>

pkg search -lr depend::system/library/gcc-7-runtime

gives 190, of which 85 are libraries:

pkg search -lr depend::system/library/gcc-7-runtime | cut -f3 -d: | fgrep /library

-- 
Dr.Udo Grabowski   Inst.f.Meteorology & Climate Research IMK-ASF-SAT
http://www.imk-asf.kit.edu/english/sat.php
KIT - Karlsruhe Institute of Technology           http://www.kit.edu
Postfach 3640,76021 Karlsruhe,Germany T:(+49)721 608-26026 F:-926026

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5804 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20230712/62e47831/attachment.bin>