[OpenIndiana-discuss] [oi-dev] [illumos-Developer] OpenIndiana and illumos, part 2

[Christopher Chan]

On Sunday, November 21, 2010 10:09 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Saturday, November 20, 2010 05:40 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
>> wrote:
>>> Christopher Chan wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, November 20, 2010 07:56 AM, Gary wrote:
>
>>
>> In what way did I flame Gary? If expressing my opinion equates flaming
>> then I feel very sorry for you. In fact, if you want an example of a
>> flame, maybe what seems to be a sarcastic reply higher up seems to
>> smack of a flame more than my reply since I did not imply anything
>> about Gary.
>>
>
> Errr... You didn't flame him. "I" was flamed as I posted a message at
> oi-dev list, which was considered out of topic.

Oh, that was what you were referring to. Well, I better wave my hands as 
on of those fools who use Openindiana in production.


>
> Read the thread started by Garrett d'Amore in oi-dev archives. It's
> interesting. I agree with Garrett.

I am subscribed. Subscribed after Garrett let off some steam on IRC and 
was told to post to oi-dev.


> Being supported by some commercial companies is surely better than
> having to work in a team with very constrained resources. And, IMHO, one
> surely shall agree that people working on openindiana/illumos shall get
> some benefit from their work. Ther's no free lunch... ;-)

Oh of course.

>>
>> We can't have that. If everybody stays mum then how can we get a list
>> of ideas for vetting? For now I think we should stop worrying about
>> where innovation will come from and concentrate on keeping Openindiana
>> relevant.
>
> Yesss... People should try to find the better roadmap to ensure illumos
> and openindiana will survive. But I arrived to an age (> 50) when I
> haven't any more time to discuss with kids wanting to flame me for
> netiquette issues.
>

LOL. I'll get off your lawn now.