[OpenIndiana-discuss] Fileserver performance with log and cache devices?
Gary Mills
gary_mills at fastmail.fm
Sat Dec 3 15:19:45 UTC 2011
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:34:17PM +0100, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 07:44 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:59:48AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
> >>I'm in the process of setting up a fileserver running oi_151a. How
> >>can I determine the performance improvement from adding log and cache
> >>devices? I'm using filebench with the fileserver personality. Is
> >>that my best choice? So far, I've tried filebench directly on the
> >>server and also on an NFS client. What statistics should I be
> >>watching?
> >So, can nobody answer my questions?
> >
> http://constantin.glez.de/blog/2011/02/frequently-asked-questions-about-flash-memory-ssds-and-zfs
> # How Do I Know if an SSD Will Really Help My Write Performance? <http://constantin.glez.de/blog/2011/02/frequently-asked-questions-about-flash-memory-ssds-and-zfs#write>
> # How Do I Know if an SSD Will Really Help My Read Performance? <http://constantin.glez.de/blog/2011/02/frequently-asked-questions-about-flash-memory-ssds-and-zfs#read>
Thanks. That article provides me with plenty of leads. It looks as
if I should use filebench only a load generator, ignoring the
statistics that it produces. Then I should use Richard Elling's
zilstat to evaluate synchronous write performance and Ben Rockwood's
arc_summary to evaluate read performance. I can certainly do that.
--
-Gary Mills- -refurb- -Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada-
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list