[OpenIndiana-discuss] Performance problem with Flash & Firefox 4.0 b10

ken mays maybird1776 at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 12 18:19:30 UTC 2011


Bill,

Update to Flash 10.2 and retry with your OI_148 test environment. 

~ Ken Mays

--- On Sat, 2/12/11, Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at alum.mit.edu>
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Performance problem with Flash & Firefox 4.0 b10
> To: openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> Date: Saturday, February 12, 2011, 12:40 PM
> On 02/01/11 12:14, Hillel Lubman
> wrote:
> > After upgrading to Frefox 4.0 b10 and Flash plugin
> 10.1 r102 on OpenIndiana
> > oi_148, Flash started to consume close to 100% CPU
> when activated, as well
> > as crashing quite often. Is it a known issue?
> 
> I've seen this with Firefox 4.0b10 and Firefox 4.0b11.
> 
> truss shows lots of yield() system calls (mpstat suggests
> over 300k per second).  pstack shows the following
> stack traces:
> 
> : 2 %; c++filt </tmp/ffloop
> -----------------  lwp# 12 / thread# 12 
> --------------------
>  fe920e67 yield    (d7591ac0, f3bf21a0, f0affde8,
> 0, e7eea168, fea6d3dc) + 7
>  fea4ae3a PR_Sleep (0) + a2
>  fcfe4693 unsigned
> mozilla::storage::AsyncExecuteStatements::Run() (d4794290,
> 1, f0affed8, 0) + 2e3
>  fd5fcf33 unsigned nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(int,int*)
> (e7efc880, 1, f0afff3c, fd57a580) + 22f
>  fd57a5b5 int NS_ProcessNextEvent_P(nsIThread*,int)
> (e7efc880, 1, f0afff6c, fd5fbdd4) + 45
>  fd5fbe48 void nsThread::ThreadFunc(void*) (e7efc880) + 94
>  fea49be1 _pt_root (e7eed6a0, fe9ae000, f0afffe8, fe91c03e)
> + c9
>  fe91c093 _thrp_setup (f9a75a40) + 9b
>  fe91c320 _lwp_start (f9a75a40, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
> 
> -----------------  lwp# 20 / thread# 20 
> --------------------
>  fe920e67 yield    (c0af65c0, f3bf21a0, e69fede8,
> 0, e7cab688, fea6d3dc) + 7
>  fea4ae3a PR_Sleep (0) + a2
>  fcfe4693 unsigned
> mozilla::storage::AsyncExecuteStatements::Run() (de313f10,
> 1, e69feed8, 0) + 2e3
>  fd5fcf33 unsigned nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(int,int*)
> (e7cd2280, 1, e69fef3c, fd57a580) + 22f
>  fd57a5b5 int NS_ProcessNextEvent_P(nsIThread*,int)
> (e7cd2280, 1, e69fef6c, fd5fbdd4) + 45
>  fd5fbe48 void nsThread::ThreadFunc(void*) (e7cd2280) + 94
>  fea49be1 _pt_root (e7699080, fe9ae000, e69fefe8, fe91c03e)
> + c9
>  fe91c093 _thrp_setup (f9a79a40) + 9b
>  fe91c320 _lwp_start (f9a79a40, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
> 
> I downloaded the firefox source.  The code suggests
> that sqlite is returning SQLITE_BUSY errors to the
> AsyncExecuteStatements code, and it's busy-looping --
> calling PR_Sleep(0).
> 
> I haven't looked at why sqlite would return SQLITE_BUSY
> yet, but this is at least consistent with url completion not
> working when the process gets into this stuck state.
> 
> as an experiment I've hot-patched my running binary to
> change it to a PR_Sleep(1) (don't have a build environment
> set up to build firefox..) so it shouldn't burn as much
> cpu.
> 
>            
>            
>     - Bill



      



More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list