[OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs-discuss] zfs incremental send?

[Reginald Beardsley]

Not sure what you're trying to say.

"zfs send snapshot | zfs receive filesystem"

produced no filesystem when I killed the job prematurely after copying 1+ GB which makes good sense.  Far better not to create a munged filesystem.  Note I tried this w/ S10 U8.

I certainly encountered no problems starting and stopping the job or when I killed it.

I wonder if your problem wasn't the pool "failmode=" setting.  I had a panic w/ zfs 4 when I accidentally dropped power to the USB disk I was writing to.  Rattled me pretty badly.

Have Fun!
Reg

--- On Tue, 3/29/11, Jonathan Adams <t12nslookup at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Jonathan Adams <t12nslookup at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs-discuss] zfs incremental send?
> To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" <openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org>
> Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 9:52 AM
> Just to clarify; Our issue was we did
> a send and receive in the same
> pipe, when it died the receive died too, and that caused
> trouble.  the
> send on it's own was alright, the receive caused problems.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>