[OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?

[låzaro]

anyway... postfix is the better today :D

I saw using Qmail long time ago, I like it, but is obsolete

Also, I have my compiled Qmail and configured just as "personal email
museum"

Thread name: "Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?" 
Mail number: 17 
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 
In reply to: Christopher Chan <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk> 
>
> On Monday, April 23, 2012 08:44 PM, låzaro wrote:
> >in Qmail, the security is patch-maked in postfix is by-design-maked
> 
> NO, that is not accurate. "security" where it means anti-spam, DJB
> did not bother because as far as he is concerned, the way things
> are, things are just broken. Too bad his idea of how email should
> work never took off. So any anti-spam features are provided by
> THIRD-PARTIES. It is not 'patch-maked'. There is zero anti-spam.
> 
> As for postfix, 'by-design-maked' just means Wietse put in the time
> to develop postfix unlike DJB who stopped in 1998.
> 
> >for example, smtp auth, SASL, TLS and soon. Also postfix is more
> >modular. You can use it with someSQL LDAP and all thats cute things.
> 
> There is a qmail fork that does both sql and ldap too. postfix is
> only better because its developer continued to work on the code and
> keep up with the times and he built a good reputation while at it.
> 
> No qmail fork has ever managed that because of DJB's stand on
> licensing but now that qmail is public domain, maybe in the future
> one of these forks might.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

--