[OpenIndiana-discuss] CIFS performance issues
Robin Axelsson
gu99roax at student.chalmers.se
Tue Jan 24 17:33:03 UTC 2012
On 2012-01-24 16:52, Gary Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:39:42PM +0100, Robin Axelsson wrote:
>>>> ifconfig -a returns:
>>>> ...
>>>> e1000g1: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu
>>>> 1500 index 2
>>>> inet 10.40.137.185 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.40.137.255
>>>> e1000g2: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu
>>>> 1500 index 3
>>>> inet 10.40.137.196 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.40.137.255
>>>> rge0: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu 1500
>>>> index
>>>> 4
> Do you really have two ethernet ports on the same network? You can't
> do that without some sort of link aggregation on both ends of the
> connection.
I don't see why not. I've done this before and it used to work just
fine. These are two different controllers that work independently and I
do it so that the VM(s) could have its own NIC to work with as I believe
the virtual network bridge interferes with other network activity.
If we assume that both ports give rise to problems because they run
without teaming/link aggregation (which I think not) then there wouldn't
be any issues if I only used one network port. I have tried with only
one port and the issues are considerably worse in that configuration.
>> I experienced a series of shorter freeze-ups today (3-5 seconds
>> long) while monitoring the system using "System Monitor" through the
>> 'vncserver' and 'top' over SSH. Those freeze-ups affected th CIFS
>> connection, SSH, and VNC connection (but did not sever them). The
>> freeze-ups were not long enough so that I could get to check the RDP
>> connection to the VM.
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list