[OpenIndiana-discuss] Holding port numbers for servers
Michael Stapleton
michael.stapleton at techsologic.com
Mon Nov 5 16:11:03 UTC 2012
Hi Jim,
TCP/UDP tunable:
#ndd /dev/tcp tcp_extra_priv_ports
http://www.sean.de/Solaris/soltune.html#portnumbers
Mike
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 16:59 +0100, Jim Klimov wrote:
> Back in the old days when internet authors thought that there was
> going to be not much server software, they created IANA to track
> registered ports for some apps, and the general convention was
> that ports under 1024 are reserved, and ports above that are to
> be issued freely to any networked app on the system. Lots has
> happened since then, and ports "above" are often typically used
> by servers too, i.e. 8080 for appservers or squid, etc.
>
> I've (rarely) had problems starting some appservers because a
> network client running on the same OS was randomly issued the
> needed port number for its communications.
>
> I haven't seen this behavior for a while, so wanted to ask: are
> there now any provisions NOT to issue certain ports (i.e. list
> from /etc/services) when an applications opens a client socket?
> That is, the listed ports should only be issued if the app binds
> itself to this port number explicitly.
>
> If this is catered for already - cool; if not - I think it is a
> worthy RFE...
>
> Thanks,
> //Jim Klimov
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list