[OpenIndiana-discuss] Only one SSD detected on expander
Rich
rercola at acm.jhu.edu
Wed Oct 17 16:13:10 UTC 2012
SATA devices are not required to provide a WWN - I would guess that
they're providing the same WWN, and as a result, your SAS devices are
becoming sad.
If you could tell the expander(s) to ignore that and assign one,
that'd be neat. If there's a firmware update to fix it, even better.
If you want to shell out for SAS -> SATA interposers, that would
probably also solve it, though I can't swear to anything, but that'd
probably be more expensive than returning + replacing the SSDs.
Don't know. If it were me, I'd complain to Samsung support and see
what you got back.
- Rich
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Scott Marcy <oi at mscott.org> wrote:
> Well, I enabled multipath support with 'stmsboot -e -D mpt' and rebooted and now it seems I have two paths to what is no doubt two physical devices:
>
> $ mpathadm list LU
> /dev/rdsk/c7t5002538043584D30d0s2
> Total Path Count: 2 <-- Unlikely that this is correct
> Operational Path Count: 2
> /dev/rdsk/c7t5000C5005168B2F0d0s2
> Total Path Count: 1
> Operational Path Count: 1
> /dev/rdsk/c7t5000C5005169A612d0s2
> Total Path Count: 1
> Operational Path Count: 1
> /dev/rdsk/c7t5000C500517042D9d0s2
> Total Path Count: 1
> Operational Path Count: 1
> /dev/rdsk/c7t5000C5005169CC6Ad0s2
> Total Path Count: 1
> Operational Path Count: 1
> /dev/rdsk/c7t5000C500515199BDd0s2
> Total Path Count: 1
> Operational Path Count: 1
> /dev/rdsk/c7t5000C500513A0EFEd0s2
> Total Path Count: 1
> Operational Path Count: 1
>
> $ mpathadm show LU /dev/rdsk/c7t5002538043584D30d0s2
> Logical Unit: /dev/rdsk/c7t5002538043584D30d0s2
> mpath-support: libmpscsi_vhci.so
> Vendor: ATA
> Product: SAMSUNG SSD 830
> Revision: 3B1Q
> Name Type: unknown type
> Name: 5002538043584d30
> Asymmetric: no
> Current Load Balance: none
> Logical Unit Group ID: NA
> Auto Failback: on
> Auto Probing: NA
>
> Paths:
> Initiator Port Name: w500605b0054819b0
> Target Port Name: w5002538043584d30
> Override Path: NA
> Path State: OK
> Disabled: no
>
> Initiator Port Name: w500605b0054819b0
> Target Port Name: w5002538043584d30
> Override Path: NA
> Path State: OK
> Disabled: no
>
> Target Ports:
> Name: w5002538043584d30
> Relative ID: 0
>
> And cfgadm still only shows one SSD on each expander, when I actually have two on each expander.
>
> $ cfgadm -al
> Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition
> c6 scsi-sas connected configured unknown
> c6::es/ses0 ESI connected configured unknown
> c6::smp/expd0 smp connected configured unknown
> c6::w5002538043584d30,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c6::w5000c500513a0efe,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c6::w5000c5005168b2f0,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c6::w5000c5005169a612,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c6::w5000c5005169cc6a,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c6::w5000c500515199bd,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c6::w5000c500517042d9,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c8 scsi-sas connected configured unknown
> c8::es/ses1 ESI connected configured unknown
> c8::smp/expd1 smp connected configured unknown
> c8::w5002538043584d30,0 disk-path connected configured unknown
> c9 scsi-sas connected unconfigured unknown
>
> I also wonder if there might be an issue with duplicate initiator-port names:
>
> $ mpathadm list initiator-port
> Initiator Port: w500605b0054819b0
> Initiator Port: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:01:bb4db0fbffff.507ec650,4000002a00ff
> Initiator Port: w500605b0054819b0
>
> Although I'm definitely venturing outside my knowledge base here--maybe this is expected and correct. (I assume each initiator-port represents an expander, but both expanders are connected to the one HBA, one to each SFF-8087 port. Also, I do have comstar running, which I expect explains the iSCSI initiator in this list.)
>
> -Scott
>
> On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Scott Marcy <mscott at mscott.org> wrote:
>
>> No, multipath support is disabled. I will try enabling it with stmsboot.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2012, at 8:15 AM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Scott Marcy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Note that both c6 and c8 have the exact same name for these drives. I *CAN* access the two drives separately, but why on earth am I getting these duplicates? This means I can only reliably access one Samsung SSD per expander.
>>>
>>> Do you have multipath support enabled on this system? I assume that the default for OpenIndiana x86 is still that multipath support is disabled by default.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>> --
>>> Bob Friesenhahn
>>> bfriesen at simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
>>> GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
>>> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list