[OpenIndiana-discuss] Interesting question about L2ARC
Dan Swartzendruber
dswartz at druber.com
Tue Sep 11 13:34:06 UTC 2012
At the moment, 20GB. Here is the hit/miss info from later in
arc_summary.pl:
CACHE HITS BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 45% 8649309
Prefetch Data: 1% 232747
Demand Metadata: 31% 5979043
Prefetch Metadata: 22% 4286704
CACHE MISSES BY DATA TYPE:
Demand Data: 56% 996300
Prefetch Data: 8% 140398
Demand Metadata: 35% 615346
Prefetch Metadata: 0% 1196
-----Original Message-----
From: Sašo Kiselkov [mailto:skiselkov.ml at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:31 AM
To: Dan Swartzendruber
Cc: zfs at lists.illumos.org; 'Discussion list for OpenIndiana'
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Interesting question about L2ARC
On 09/11/2012 03:27 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
>
> Saso, I think you might be on to something here. This is a handful of
> VM's, none doing anything all that disk intensive, so any disk I/O
> will tend to be somewhat random. I'm not so worried about premature
> death of the device, since it's a brand-new device, and we're not
> talking hundreds of terabytes per month or anything. My pool is
> definitely NOT throughput stressed (rarely exceeding a 20-30 MB/sec at
> most), so latency is more of a priority to me. I'll give this a try,
thanks!
>
What is your ARC size? Chances are your dataset fits entirely in the ARC.
Just a quick guess.
Cheers,
--
Saso
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list