[OpenIndiana-discuss] RAIDZ performance

[Jozsef Brogyanyi]

Please look the "load" in the top.The CPU idle time is not enough.The
difference is very huge.In your case may be the load over the "2".If am I
right then your CPU is weak for this feature.
Check again.
Brogyi

2013/2/20 Reginald Beardsley <pulaskite at yahoo.com>

> On an N40L running oi_151a7 w/ four ST2000DM001 drives I'm seeing a large
> drop in performance for RAIDZ2 vs RAIDZ1 which surprises me.
>
> The discussions google found were not entirely enlightening and not OI
> based.  How much CPU does a small OI based ZFS server need?
>
> For 3 disk RAIDZ1 I get 189-199 MB/s and 179 MB/s for 4 disk RAIDZ1.  But
> for 4 disk RAIDZ2 I get 109-118 MB/s.  I expected some loss in performance,
> but not that much.  These are measured writing 64 GB of /dev/zero to the
> RAIDZ filesystem from a console window.
>
> For a 256 GB file I got 111 MB/s writing and 279 MB/s reading 4 disk
> RAIDZ2.
>
> System is unloaded w/ 4 GB of ECC DRAM using a 4-way mirror rpool in the
> s0 slices w/ RAIDZ in the s1 slices.
>
> Does the drop in RAIDZ2 write performance correspond to other people's
> experience? If so, why such a large hit?  top suggests the system has spare
> CPU capacity (30-50% idle). For my current needs things look good, but I'd
> like to understand why a bit better.  Or if there is some tuning I should
> do.
>
> Have Fun!
> Reg
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>