[OpenIndiana-discuss] iostat
jason matthews
jason at broken.net
Fri Oct 11 18:43:56 UTC 2013
the system config is as follows:
4x 4650L, 576GB of RAM, 8x 800GB DC S3700 load balanced over 2x LSI 9207-8i
there is no swap. i am only running filebench on the pool so far.
j.
On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:28 AM, Jonathan Adams <t12nslookup at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ouch! they are _some_ drives ...
>
> do you have "swap" running on them? how much ram do you have in that
> machine?
>
>
> On 11 October 2013 16:44, Jason Matthews <jason at broken.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> i would say so. they are 800gb intel dc s3700s
>>
>> j.
>>
>> Sent from Jasons' hand held
>>
>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 1:08 AM, Jonathan Adams <t12nslookup at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> do you have "Enterprise" grade disks in your machine? We saw a lot of %b
>>> and %w associated with "Consumer" Seagate disks ... not all the time, and
>>> not for over a year in production, but once it started happening across
>>> multiple servers we cottoned on pretty quickly.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 October 2013 21:39, jason matthews <jason at broken.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure when reporting zpool stats was introduced into iostat but
>> i
>>>> love it. however, i am not sure what to make of it.
>>>>
>>>> For instance, what does a wsvc time of 20 seconds tell me? seems like my
>>>> queue is too big but that is not reflected in individual device
>> statistics.
>>>> in the case of zpools, is this some sort of reflection on transaction
>>>> groups?
>>>>
>>>> can anyone explain why i see such large time associated with zpool in
>> the
>>>> iostat output?
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> j.
>>>>
>>>> extended device statistics
>>>> r/s w/s Mr/s Mw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b
>>>> device
>>>> 0.0 3958.7 0.0 300.7 0.1 18.8 0.0 4.7 0
>>>> 153 c3
>>>> 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6
>>>> 0 0 c3t55CD2E400012A66Cd0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c3t55CD2E400012B753d0
>>>> 0.0 2679.7 0.0 149.1 0.1 9.9 0.0 3.7 5
>>>> 80 c3t50015178F36579E8d0
>>>> 0.0 1267.2 0.0 151.5 0.0 8.8 0.0 7.0 3
>>>> 73 c3t50015178F3657B74d0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c3t50015178F3657AECd0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c3t50015178F36579E1d0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c3t50015178F3657B85d0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c3t50015178F36579BAd0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c3t50015178F3657A05d0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c3t50015178F36579FEd0
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c5
>>>> 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>>>> 0 0 c5t4d0
>>>> 0.0 3946.1 0.0 300.6 80582.9 26.2 20421.0 6.6 88 89 data
>>>> 0.0 11.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.8 0 0 rpool
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
>>>> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
>>> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
>> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list