[oi-dev] Some numbers for NFS builds

Bayard Bell buffer.g.overflow at googlemail.com
Sun Jun 5 13:55:02 UTC 2011


Long and short seems to be that the difference isn't so bad, it's just proportionately more when doing an incremental build in the case where there aren't any changes.

full build (-FnCDlmprt):

ZFS

real       56:48.91
user     6:00:35.76
sys        58:53.77

real       56:44.43
user     5:58:27.00
sys      1:36:39.84

NFS

real     1:07:19.96
user     6:04:27.15
sys      1:19:09.63

real     1:11:43.07
user     6:11:43.47
sys      1:21:22.65

incremental (-iFnCDlmprt):

ZFS

real       28:45.12
user     1:38:04.47
sys        17:05.66

real       29:09.10
user     1:32:59.43
sys        59:13.10

NFS

real       39:33.68
user     1:37:55.99
sys        23:06.83

real       39:57.23
user     1:33:09.83
sys        22:46.34


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1515 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20110605/6f762497/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20110605/6f762497/attachment-0009.bin>


More information about the oi-dev mailing list