[oi-dev] Some numbers for NFS builds
Bayard Bell
buffer.g.overflow at googlemail.com
Sun Jun 5 13:55:02 UTC 2011
Long and short seems to be that the difference isn't so bad, it's just proportionately more when doing an incremental build in the case where there aren't any changes.
full build (-FnCDlmprt):
ZFS
real 56:48.91
user 6:00:35.76
sys 58:53.77
real 56:44.43
user 5:58:27.00
sys 1:36:39.84
NFS
real 1:07:19.96
user 6:04:27.15
sys 1:19:09.63
real 1:11:43.07
user 6:11:43.47
sys 1:21:22.65
incremental (-iFnCDlmprt):
ZFS
real 28:45.12
user 1:38:04.47
sys 17:05.66
real 29:09.10
user 1:32:59.43
sys 59:13.10
NFS
real 39:33.68
user 1:37:55.99
sys 23:06.83
real 39:57.23
user 1:33:09.83
sys 22:46.34
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1515 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20110605/6f762497/attachment-0008.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20110605/6f762497/attachment-0009.bin>
More information about the oi-dev
mailing list