[oi-dev] review for 1619: Mercurial needs to transition to python2.6

[Bayard G. Bell]

On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 14:57 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
> I think that that looks correct.
> 
> That said, you're unlikely to find anyone overly thrilled by the idea
> of rebuilding (all of) SFW, so you may want to check if folks are
> willing to dock a new package and re-import to get the update, or
> whether they'd prefer an oi-build based way to do it, or... well, I
> don't know.

To try to put it briefly: if I were really moving forward, I'd that in
oi-build (where a later version of Mercurial is already in place for
sustaining). As I'm just doing some minor shifting (sideways instead of
forward, as it were), it seemed simpler to do this with the existing
build system, which I'm modestly tweaking for the package.

> (I'd like to note that I'm suggesting that moving it to oi-build for
> sustaining is *correct*, just a lot more likely to get traction as far
> as it actually getting published afterward)
> 
> -- Rich
> 
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/attachments/20111013/8b068383/attachment-0005.bin>