[oi-dev] issue #2172

[Christopher Chan]

Okay, going as is without the kerberos patch (but we are using MIT 
kerberos right? why are we using the heimdal specific stuff...) but 
using illumos userland throws a whole load of dependency errors at the 
end. What do you want to do for an oi_151a update package? Set back for 
oi_151a sfw-gate dependencies or ...

Christopher

On Monday, March 05, 2012 11:13 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
> Yes.  The Oracle patch set did a "shadow copy patch" (as you describe it)
> by which I assume you mean the configuration strategy where they make
> two copies of the source and build in each, etc.  That was done due to some
> bugs in the Samba autoconf scripts, which I chose instead to fix and submit
> for inclusion into Samba.  (They should be in Samba already, but were then
> delayed by some copyright discussions.  Those are now resolved, so the
> changes should be in samba once I update them to current samba revs.)
>
> The change to the libraries was because I prefer linking with the normal
> system default LDAP and GSSAPI support instead of the Netscape one.
> Previous changes to the Samba config had switched from libldap to the
> NSPR librarires due to a missing API function that Samba needs.  I fixed
> our libldap in illumos to provide the missing function, so we can continue
> to use the system libldap with Samba.
>
> So in short, both of the above are just better ways to fix things than what
> the Oracle userland port of samba does.
>
> Gordon
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Christopher Chan
> <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk>  wrote:
>> Hi Gordon,
>>
>> In the build patch you made for illumos-userland, i notice that there are
>> differences from the way the current samba package on oi151a is built. Like
>> no more linking against sun ldap libraries, no more shadow copy patch and
>> some others.
>>
>> is there a reason?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Christopher
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:24 AM, Gordon Ross wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.illumos.org/projects/illumos-userland
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Christopher Chan
>>> <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk>    wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The patch appears to apply to a tree...which tree is it?
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Christopher
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> oi-dev mailing list
>>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> oi-dev mailing list
>> oi-dev at openindiana.org
>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev