[oi-dev] MATE 1.14 Desktop for OpenIndiana

[Jim Klimov]

9 мая 2016 г. 1:18:57 CEST, Nikola M <minikola at gmail.com> пишет:
>On 05/ 9/16 01:09 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Nikola M <minikola at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:minikola at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     It is about precising what is named what.
>>     Not looking what is active and how long and how.
>>
>>     You can't call /dev past development releases a "Legacy" since
>>     "Legacy" is reserved for /legacy and they are Opensolaris dev.
>>     releases.
>>
>>     It's not about what is active or, not, we all know only OI
>hipster
>>     is currently active it is simple you can't just decide to change
>>     /dev's name because you say so,
>>     because you create conflict of naming that creates confusion for
>>     users and documentation.
>>
>>     I don't find this humorous , I understand you recommend that
>>     Openindiana development releases in /dev be called "Vintage
>releases".
>>     I don't think that is more appropriate to call it "Old
>Openindiana
>>     /dev development releases" and naming it wit any new name
>>     including one you proposed, would create confusion and disable
>>     /dev renewal.
>>
>>
>> OK. The difference is between names and labels: labels are moving
>targets.
>
>You can't introduce any labels, because they collide with the name as 
>explained or are innacurate. Labels are not needed and are confusing.
>
>Ok, so you will fix it to wording be "Old Openindiana development 
>releases" ?
>And you will fix it that there is no any "Devide" in Openindiana in the
>
>past and now?
>That requires that your announcement be rewritten?
>What do you propose to be exact wording of an announcement then?
>
>I hope we don't need to put this to the vote,
>since it is obvious that /legacy exists and is in use and that
>"Vintage" 
>cna't be used for labeling,
>because it hurts proposed /dev repository renewal project.
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>oi-dev mailing list
>oi-dev at openindiana.org
>http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Hi Nikola,

I guess you're late to this particular party - the way to move forward with the resources and luggage we have was indeed discussed long ago.

On the upside, whatever the naming and distribution of packages and recipes across consolidations, OI Hipster and according to plan also its expected less-bloody releases (dev, stable) after migration of all userland into one recipe repo/consolidation, are upgrade-compatible with the last OI-dev and OpenSolaris Indiana.

Jim 
--
Typos courtesy of K-9 Mail on my Samsung Android