[oi-dev] gcc builds - no cc1objplus

[Andreas Wacknitz]

Am 22.02.21 um 13:38 schrieb Klaus Ziegler - owner of sunfreeware.de:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason why we don't provide cc1objplus compiler in gcc
> builds?
Most probably because nobody uses it and if we merge it into OI Hipster
we will have to support it.
Thus, additional work and not much gain.


> --- Makefile.orig    2021-02-21 21:09:30.515646158 +0000
> +++ Makefile    2021-02-21 21:17:44.199125768 +0000
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
>  CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-plugins
>  CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-objc-gc
>  CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.i386+= --enable-initfini-array
> -CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc
> +CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++
>  CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --disable-libitm
>  CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= enable_frame_pointer=yes
>
> maybe just forgotten? however including it does not harm at all,
> and the tests for it also work fine:
>
>         === obj-c++ tests ===
>
>
> Running target unix/-m64
>
>         === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===
>
> # of expected passes        1451
> # of expected failures        10
> # of unsupported tests        77
>
> Running target unix/-m64/-msave-args
>
>         === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64/-msave-args ===
>
> # of expected passes        1451
> # of expected failures        10
> # of unsupported tests        77
>
>         === obj-c++ Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes        2902
> # of expected failures        20
> # of unsupported tests        154
>
> Much Regards
> Klaus
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev