[oi-dev] upstreaming our libtool search_path patch

[Till Wegmueller]

No Objections here.

As Bob and you have stated it is easier. And I see no reason to 
complicate this.

-Till

On 24.11.21 19:26, Tim Mooney via oi-dev wrote:
> 
> All-
> 
> After years of being without one, libtool has a maintainer again.
> The first step he or she is taking is to go through the backlog of patches
> from the various Linux and BSD distros, to apply any that are generally
> useful.
> 
> We're currently carrying two patches against libtool, while Oracle's
> solaris-userland has just one:
> 
>      https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/blob/master/components/libtool/patches/000-64-bit-sys_dlsearch_path.patch
> 
> Theirs appears to be just an alternate approach to solving the same
> problem as our first patch.
> 
> Any objection to pointing the maintainer at the solaris-userland patch
> and letting them know that that patch is beneficial for both commercial
> Solaris and for OpenIndiana?  I would like to get one of the patches
> into upstream, and it seems easiest to vote for the solaris-userland one
> as acceptable to both OSes.
> 
> Tim