[OpenIndiana-discuss] Networking with Zones an Crossbow

Gabriel de la Cruz gabriel.delacruz at gmail.com
Tue Mar 29 09:25:18 UTC 2011


I don't see why not to use a bridge either, promiscuous mode at the
level you have on your setup should be meaningless to your data
center.
You wont be the first one doing this kind of setup, most of network
virtualization deployments would be impossible otherwise.

BR
g


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Gary <gdriggs at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011, Darko Hojnik wrote:
>
>> Any ideas how I could deploy like this using Crossbow in Zones without a
>> bridge?
>>
>>
>>             network
>>  <      Subnet 10.0.0.0       >
>>                |
>>      _     global Zone     _
>>     |       10.0.0.2        |
>>     |          |            |
>>     |          |            |
>>  Zone 1      Zone 2       Zone3
>>  10.0.0.3    10.0.0.4     10.0.0.5
>
> That won't work with a NAT setup -- you'll have to choose a different
> subnet for your internal systems and route all traffic through the
> global zone's IP. That may be OK if you have only a handful of
> services that require inbound connections but you may want to consider
> bridging. I've personally never heard of anyone objecting to (or even
> noticing) when interfaces are in promiscuous mode. But if you plan on
> simplifying your environment, bridging is probably the best way to go.
> It also simplifies things considerably if you decide down the road to
> move the local zone to another server.
>
> -Gary
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>



More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list