[OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?

[låzaro]

in Qmail, the security is patch-maked in postfix is by-design-maked

for example, smtp auth, SASL, TLS and soon. Also postfix is more
modular. You can use it with someSQL LDAP and all thats cute things.

If need some help with postfix, can mail me to the private, postfix is
my strong point.

 Greetings

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 08:00 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> So are people up for netqmail, daemontools, djbdns packages?
> 
> On Sunday, April 22, 2012 08:34 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
> > Which brings us back to qmail.  I've been using it flawlessly
> starting 
> > on a Sparc IPC running SunOS before Postfix was a gleam in Wietse 
> > Venema's eye.  The darn thing is rock solid, secure, lightweight,
> and 
> > fast.  That said, I have nothing against Postfix other that I've
> never 
> > had a reason to look further than qmail.
> 
> You did. That's why you are not running qmail-smtpd. Not even a
> patched 
> qmail-smtpd. Yes, DJB designed qmail to be modular and using
> third-party 
> modules is far game but using third-party modules already means it is 
> not qmail. Stop deluding yourself. qmail's main problem has always
> been 
> back-scatter due to lack of smtp time recipient checking not mention
> all 
> the other host of things one needs/wants do before accepting message 
> body data.
> 
> You have looked beyond qmail and decided to stick with dot-qmail and 
> other goodies and found yourself a qmail-smtpd replacement.