[OpenIndiana-discuss] User management tools for OI_151a?

[Hans J. Albertsson]

I tried napp-it, and I get several problems: Can you comment?
I will of course write to napp-it.org as well.
Two problems that seem to partly defeat it's usefulness for a small 
installation are:
1.
There's a live monitoring facility, it seems, using websockets. It 
claims there's no websocket support in my browser, Firefox 9.01.
I have enabled websockets in the config page, but napp-it still claims 
it isn't there. I don't know, really, but I think websockets supposedly 
work in firefox.

2.
"ZFS folders" gives no info, just headers. This supposedly displays info 
from like zfs list -o .... I suppose?
Seems non-functional.

Even if these two won't work, it could still be useful for a very large 
installation, due e g to the pool mgmt stuff, and creating folders and 
stuff.


On 2012-01-18 03:48, openindiana-discuss-request at openindiana.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:03:59 -0500
> From: Robbie Crash<sardonic.smiles at gmail.com>
> To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
> 	<openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org>
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] User management tools for OI_151a?
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAPVmm=aO7VA42j1tSYEtcwcyPg_9WmK2HyTUm3rVSApNQg8M_g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi I'm new.
>
> Napp-it:www.napp-it.org
>
> Offers most of what you're looking for and is clear enough that us
> 'Microsoft people' can figure out what to do without breaking things. It's
> obviously not as powerful as access via shell, but it does make creating
> automatic snapshot jobs much more simple.
>
> ZFS share config and overall usage is there, and clear. Not sure if you can
> create arrays, as I have no spare disks with which to test, but pool
> creation and basic management is present. It also saved me a bunch of time
> after a motherboard died and I had to rebuild my fileserver. Installing and
> configuring netatalk with it was a lot quicker than doing it the manual
> way, and got everything working just the same.
>
> It's by no means as full featured as webmin, but it can do about 75% of the
> stuff I've wanted it to do.