[OpenIndiana-discuss] Odd Samba/winbind issue
Jonathan Adams
t12nslookup at gmail.com
Fri Jun 21 12:58:49 UTC 2013
can you give us a look at "testparm -v" so we can see the configuration
setup?
obviously hide IPs and domains if you need to.
On 21 June 2013 13:50, James Relph <james at themacplace.co.uk> wrote:
> Thanks Laurent, appreciate the help.
>
> > I'm maintaining that package, I do want to keep it running on OI as
> well, so it's good to know it's working there.
>
> Both cswsamba and cswwinbind do seem to be working fine, they're just not
> talking to each other!
>
> > It might be a Samba configuration issue, but before trying on a
> Samba-specific list, we can surely dig here first :-)
> > Can you post the output of:
> >
> > ldd -v /opt/csw/sbin/smbd /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
>
> /opt/csw/sbin/smbd:
>
> find object=libc.so.1; required by /opt/csw/sbin/smbd
> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
> find version=libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.18) => /lib/libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
>
> object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for /usr/lib/ld.so.1
>
> object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for libm.so.2
>
> find object=libm.so.2; required by /lib/libc.so.1
> libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
>
> find object=libc.so.1; required by /lib/libm.so.2
> find version=libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
> /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd:
>
> find object=libc.so.1; required by /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd
> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
> find version=libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.18) => /lib/libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
>
> object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for /usr/lib/ld.so.1
>
> object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for libm.so.2
>
> find object=libm.so.2; required by /lib/libc.so.1
> libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
>
> find object=libc.so.1; required by /lib/libm.so.2
> find version=libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
> /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd:
>
> find object=libc.so.1; required by /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
> find version=libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.18) => /lib/libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
>
> object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for /usr/lib/ld.so.1
>
> object=/lib/libc.so.1; filter for libm.so.2
>
> find object=libm.so.2; required by /lib/libc.so.1
> libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
>
> find object=libc.so.1; required by /lib/libm.so.2
> find version=libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1) => /lib/libc.so.1
>
> > ps -edf | egrep 'smbd|nmbd|winbind'
>
> root 19244 19243 0 06:37:01 ? 1:15 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19260 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:02 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19255 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 21427 19243 0 09:06:04 ? 1:02 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19257 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19239 17386 0 06:36:59 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/smbd -D
> root 19258 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:02 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19243 17386 0 06:37:01 ? 0:21 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19240 19239 0 06:36:59 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/smbd -D
> root 19251 19243 0 06:37:51 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19254 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 26205 26165 0 13:48:20 pts/1 0:00 egrep smbd|nmbd|winbind
> root 19256 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:07 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19261 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19238 17386 0 06:36:59 ? 0:06 /opt/csw/sbin/nmbd -D
> root 19252 19243 0 06:37:51 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19262 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 19259 19243 0 06:38:26 ? 0:08 /opt/csw/sbin/winbindd
> -D
> root 26201 19239 0 13:48:07 ? 0:00 /opt/csw/sbin/smbd -D
>
>
> > Also, do you have any log on the AD side about the try, and how it
> looked?
>
> It didn't seem to even try the AD side, but I can check again. Obviously
> just odd that it's working via other apps (ie. those using PAM) but not
> Samba itself.
>
> > While it s probably not hurting, I think that's not a good idea, and
> should not be needed in any case.
>
> Using PAM with winbind didn't work until I made those symlinks (and they
> were recommended elsewhere)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James.
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list