[OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs] problem on my zpool
Clement BRIZARD
clement at brizou.fr
Wed Oct 23 09:01:12 UTC 2013
The disks are in a Fractal XL case which have little rubber pad to
contain vibrations.
As long as it works I will leave it. When I will have some money I will
build a proper server
Once the resilvering is done, should I do a scrub job ?
Le 23/10/2013 10:16, Sebastian Gabler a écrit :
> From 'zpool status' this looks very much like an issue I had myself
> 2.5 years ago with a pool containing WD20EARS and some other 2 TB
> disks. It started exactly when I moved them from the Intel ICH to an
> LSI SAS 1068 controller, and added more disks to the enclosure. I
> decided then to destroy the whole pool and restore the data from a
> backup (well, actually the original source because the broken pool was
> the backup), without the WD20EARS involved.
>
> I wonder if there is any rescue for the pool moving them to an adapter
> they are compatible. I think that in any case the WD20EARS should be
> fine, given you can make them work.
>
> However, there is another issue to keep in mind: Vibration. WD20EARS
> are not specified to run in multi-disk enclosures. They are quite
> susceptible to vibration issues. It could be that you simple hit your
> head to the wall at that point. Better use disks with better vibration
> management.
>
> BR
>
> Sebastian
>
> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013
> 20:21:39 +1300 From: Mark <mark0x01 at gmail.com> To: Discussion list for
> OpenIndiana <openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org> Subject: Re:
> [OpenIndiana-discuss] [zfs] problem on my zpool Message-ID:
> <52677903.3030002 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed One suggestion for the future for
> better reliability. Avoid using WDC WD20EARS, they aren't great, and
> hopeless on SAS controllers. Avoid mixing disk brands or models in a
> zpool. The different behaviour can trigger issues. On 23/10/2013 7:46
> p.m., Clement BRIZARD wrote:
>>> I cleared the "degraded" disk. we will see what happens in 131hours
>>>
>>> pool: nas
>>> state: ONLINE
>>> status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool
>>> will
>>> continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
>>> action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
>>> scan: resilver in progress since Wed Oct 23 08:25:56 2013
>>> 2.23G scanned out of 22.2T at 48.6M/s, 133h22m to go
>>> 6.10M resilvered, 0.01% done
>>> config:
>>>
>>> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
>>> CAP Product
>>> nas ONLINE 0 0 0
>>> raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>> c8t50024E9004993E6Ed0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
>>> c8t50024E92062E7524d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
>>> c8t50024E900495BE84d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
>>> c8t50014EE25A5EEC23d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB WDC WD20EARS-00M
>>> c8t50024E9003F03980d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
>>> c8t50014EE2B0D3EFC8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB WDC WD20EARX-00P
>>> c8t50014EE6561DDB4Cd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB WDC WD20EARS-00M
>>> c8t50024E9003F03A09d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
>>> raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>> c50t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>> (resilvering) 2 TB ST2000DL004 HD20
>>> c2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>> (resilvering) 2 TB
>>> c1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>> (resilvering) 2 TB
>>> c50t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 2
>>> TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
>>> c50t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>>> (resilvering) 2 TB SAMSUNG HD204UI
>>>
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
More information about the OpenIndiana-discuss
mailing list