[OpenIndiana-discuss] New pkg(5) issues
Jim Klimov
jim at cos.ru
Tue Jun 16 12:32:27 UTC 2015
Hello again,
Now that I've got a newly upgraded Hipster after all, attempts to update it by running pkg fail due to:
===
Linked image publisher checkpkg: update failed (linked image exception(s)):
A 'pubcheck-linked' operation failed for child 'zone:mylocalzone' with an unexpected
return value of 99 and generated the following output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 5423, in handle_errors
__ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 1815, in __dispatch
rv = op_func(op, _api_inst, **pwargs)
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 4027, in pubcheck_linked
api_inst.linked_publisher_check()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/api.py", line 206, in wrapper
return f(instance, *fargs, **f_kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/api.py", line 1628, in linked_publisher_check
self.__linked_pubcheck()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/api.py", line 1607, in __linked_pubcheck
self._img.linked.pubcheck()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/linkedimage/common.py", line 1050, in pubcheck
linked_pub_error=(pubs, ppubs))
PlanCreationException:
Invalid child image publisher configuration. Child image publisher
configuration must be a superset of the parent image publisher configuration.
Please update the child publisher configuration to match the parent. If the
child image is a zone this can be done automatically by detaching and
attaching the zone.
The parent image has the following enabled publishers:
PUBLISHER 0: openindiana.org
PUBLISHER 1: opensolaris.org
The child image has the following enabled publishers:
PUBLISHER 0: on-nightly
PUBLISHER 1: openindiana.org (non-sticky)
PUBLISHER 2: opensolaris.org
pkg: This is an internal error in pkg(5) version 2a5f6ab. Please log a
Service Request about this issue including the information above and this
message.
===
It does not very much seem true that the child publisher configuration
is NOT a superset of the parent's one (except for that sticky remark).
Oh, and the publishers were different (2014.1 remained in the local zone).
While there was little problem removing the non-sticky note in this zone,
as well as updating the publisher definition, it did not help - same error.
Detaching and attaching (without and with "-u") did not succeed and left
the zone un-mountable so I had to rollback and fix it up.
Subsequent upgrade was to "pkg -R /zones/mylocalzone/root/ update" from GZ...
and it did not solve the issue, either.
Only removing the "on-nightly" in the local zone (so publisher lists are now
identical - which defeats the purpose of building/testing stuff in non-global
zones) allowed "pkg" to consider an upgrade strategy.
I wonder if pkg(5) worked as intended here, or there is a mistake in it indeed?
Perhaps if linked-zone operation is a no-go, it should revert to old algorithm
automatically? Or are linked images the new default/requirement?
Thanks,
// Jim Klimov
More information about the openindiana-discuss
mailing list