[OpenIndiana-discuss] Comparison of mbuffer/tamp to ssh (A novice attempt)

[Harry Putnam]

Jonathan Adams <t12nslookup at gmail.com> writes:

> Do you have any info on just how much of the time difference is just down
> to the SSH header overhead?
>
> Do you know how long this takes in comparison to starting an rsyncd server
> and sending/receiving via rsync with compression on?

No to both.

I did do some testing on 2 different ssh ciphers, arcfour, and the
default ciphers in openssh 7.[45]p1/

You can see that comparison under:
Subject: mbuffer connection refused on varius ports ... what to try

Toward the end of the thread.