[OpenIndiana-discuss] Hipster Oct 2017 virtualbox 5.2.0 guest additions?

[Michael Huff]

On 11/9/2017 8:33 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> On 10.11.2017 03:40, Michael Huff wrote:
> ...
>> ## Executing postinstall script.
>> Uncompressing files...
>> Configuring VirtualBox guest kernel module...
>> VirtualBox guest kernel module loaded.
>> VirtualBox pointer integration module loaded.
>> Creating links...
>> *** //opt/VirtualBoxAdditions/i386/vboxvideo_drv_119.so or
>> //opt/VirtualBoxAdditions/amd64/vboxvideo_drv_119.so not found!
>> *** X.org 1.19.5 not supported by this package!
>> *** Failed to install the VirtualBox X.org drivers.
>> Configuring client...
>> Installing 64-bit shared folders module...
>> Installing 32-bit shared folders module...
>> Configuring services (this might take a while)...
>> Enabling services...
>> Updating boot archive...
>> Done.
>> pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
>>
>> Installation of <SUNWvboxguest> partially failed.
>> root at virtiana:/media/VBOXADDITIONS_5.2.1_118430#
>>
>> ...one bit of weirdness I notice off the bat is that the mount folder
>> indicates that it's VB 5.2.1/build 118430; but "Help -> about" in
>> virtualbox says it's 5.2.0/build 118431. To save bandwidth I've saved
>> it to imgur and you can see it here; https://i.imgur.com/hGslkvK.png
>>
>> I'm assuming others have run into this as well, and I vaguely remember
>> it being talked about a couple months (?) ago. I'm wondering if
>> there's any work-around for this, or do I have to wait for Hipster's
>> xorg to catch up?
>
> Hello.
> This is an issue of VirtualBox - they don't provide fresh xorg drivers 
> for Solaris. I suggest you to fill bug report against VirtualBox.
>
> ---
> System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center
>
Done -https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/17260
I expect them to tell me it's OI's fault for not using the "right" xorg 
-but so it goes.

Thanks for your advice!