[OpenIndiana-discuss] SMB NFS not sure where to go
Michelle
michelle at msknight.com
Mon Aug 7 21:20:42 UTC 2023
I've translated up to the same cifs-utils version up to Mint 21.2
Victoria kernel 6.2.0-26 which is as far as I can go. I have also
turned on nbmand on, on the servers.
Oddly enough, Libre Office Writer can open and save the file on the
share. "Text Editor" otherwise known as xed 3.4.3 ... can't. It reports
the resource unavailable error.
Copying a file from network share to local machine using Nemo 5.8.4
successfully copies the file, but the progress bar stops at 50%. I've
still got the reports of the push locks and ...
Aug 7 22:14:23 main-desktop kernel: [ 5181.959778] CIFS: VFS:
\\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
Aug 7 22:14:23 main-desktop kernel: [ 5181.959819] CIFS: VFS: Push
locks rc = -22
... on the client.
Copying from the client to the server using the same version of Nemo,
results in failure to overwrite the file with...
Aug 7 22:17:09 main-desktop kernel: [ 5348.165575] CIFS: VFS:
\\192.168.0.2 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
Aug 7 22:17:09 main-desktop kernel: [ 5348.165613] CIFS: VFS: Push
locks rc = -22
... although deleting the file and then copying it up to the share,
works. Again, it looks like there's a problem deleting the original
file in order to rename the temporary file to the target file name.
Michelle.
On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 19:35 +0300, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss
wrote:
> hi!
>
> I just did test with ubuntu 22.04.01, cifs-utils:
> 2:6.14-1ubuntu0.1
>
> And seems to behave as expected. My share has nbmand=on, however.
>
> rgds,
> toomas
>
> > On 7. Aug 2023, at 19:07, Michelle <michelle at msknight.com> wrote:
> >
> > After that updating, I now have a problem copying files to and from
> > the
> > share and the client.
> >
> > Firstly... using command line to go onto the share and use Nano to
> > edit
> > a text file... no problem.
> >
> > Using Nano to browse to the mounted share, open in Text Editor,
> > edit
> > and then save... it gives "resource unavailable."
> >
> > When using Nemo to copy from the share to the local Linux machine,
> > it
> > copies the small test file successfully, but hangs on the "progress
> > bar" which never closes. I have to kill Nemo.
> >
> > When using Nemo to copy from the local Linux machine to the server
> > share, it copies up the file using the temp name, but can't
> > actually
> > replace the file.
> >
> > If I manually delete the file from the server, and then copy the
> > file
> > up to the share... it works.
> >
> > All the time, this...
> > Aug 7 16:54:16 main-desktop kernel: [ 772.668870] CIFS: VFS:
> > \\192.168.0.2 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > Aug 7 16:54:16 main-desktop kernel: [ 772.668915] CIFS: VFS: Push
> > locks rc = -22
> > ... is prevalent in the client side syslog when this is happening.
> >
> > There was a previous post in mid 2022 about a bug on Linux and that
> > the
> > workaround was to force vers=2.0 but I've tried that and there's no
> > change in the behaviour.
> >
> > From what I've read, my nbmand property is best set to off, which
> > is
> > what it is. Or do I have that wrong?
> >
> > I'm now at a loss as to where to continue looking.
> >
> > OpenIndiana Hipster 2023.05 (powered by illumos)
> >
> > Distributor ID: Linuxmint
> > Description: Linux Mint 21
> > Release: 21
> > Codename: vanessa
> >
> > mount from util-linux 2.37.2 (libmount 2.37.2: selinux, smack,
> > btrfs,
> > verity, namespaces, assert, debug)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 10:08 +0100, Michelle wrote:
> > > nbmand is off on both servers.
> > >
> > > Michelle.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 11:54 +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 7. Aug 2023, at 11:38, Michelle <michelle at msknight.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I did a quick test after updating and rebooting both servers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Copying files from one of the servers (panther - 0.4) to
> > > > > another
> > > > > server
> > > > > (jaguar - 0.2) via the Linux client ... resulted in the
> > > > > following
> > > > > in
> > > > > the log on the client, however, there was nothing in the
> > > > > syslog
> > > > > on
> > > > > either of the servers.
> > > > >
> > > > > There does seem to be a mention of a patch in Linux SMB as of
> > > > > late
> > > > > June
> > > > > this year, but having said that, there seem to be a number of
> > > > > patches
> > > > > throughout the years regarding this, but I'm unable to get a
> > > > > grip
> > > > > with
> > > > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Aug 7 09:28:35 main-desktop systemd[1109]: Starting GNOME
> > > > > Terminal
> > > > > Server...
> > > > > Aug 7 09:28:35 main-desktop dbus-daemon[1136]: [session
> > > > > uid=1101
> > > > > pid=1136] Successfully activated service 'org.gnome.Terminal'
> > > > > Aug 7 09:28:35 main-desktop systemd[1109]: Started GNOME
> > > > > Terminal
> > > > > Server.
> > > > > Aug 7 09:28:35 main-desktop systemd[1109]: Started VTE child
> > > > > process
> > > > > 1644922 launched by gnome-terminal-server process 1644897.
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:01 main-desktop CRON[1645001]: (root) CMD ([ -x
> > > > > /etc/init.d/anacron ] && if [ ! -d /run/systemd/system ];
> > > > > then
> > > > > /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d anacron start >/dev/null; fi)
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:10 main-desktop kernel: [2945189.248744] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > >
> > > > I’m not really sure where is this coming from, probably want to
> > > > check
> > > > netowk packet with tshark/wireshark.
> > > >
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:10 main-desktop kernel: [2945189.248788] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > Push
> > > > > locks rc = -22
> > > >
> > > > Do you have zfs nbmand property set on?
> > > >
> > > > rgds,
> > > > toomas
> > > >
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:20 main-desktop kernel: [2945198.711222] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:25 main-desktop kernel: [2945204.406488] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:28 main-desktop kernel: [2945206.802407] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:30 main-desktop kernel: [2945208.649958] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:32 main-desktop kernel: [2945210.907929] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:33 main-desktop kernel: [2945212.056828] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:36 main-desktop kernel: [2945214.981583] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:37 main-desktop kernel: [2945216.163547] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:37 main-desktop systemd[1109]: Started VTE child
> > > > > process
> > > > > 1645538 launched by gnome-terminal-server process 1644897.
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:39 main-desktop kernel: [2945218.019954] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:41 main-desktop kernel: [2945219.860681] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:41 main-desktop kernel: [2945220.282600] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:41 main-desktop kernel: [2945220.282649] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > Push
> > > > > locks rc = -22
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:44 main-desktop kernel: [2945222.937137] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:44 main-desktop kernel: [2945222.937168] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > Push
> > > > > locks rc = -22
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:48 main-desktop kernel: [2945227.269625] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:54 main-desktop kernel: [2945233.354499] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:30:57 main-desktop kernel: [2945235.676076] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:02 main-desktop kernel: [2945241.140574] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:06 main-desktop kernel: [2945244.760306] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:06 main-desktop systemd[1]: Started Run anacron
> > > > > jobs.
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:06 main-desktop anacron[1645804]: Anacron 2.3
> > > > > started
> > > > > on
> > > > > 2023-08-07
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:06 main-desktop anacron[1645804]: Normal exit (0
> > > > > jobs
> > > > > run)
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:06 main-desktop systemd[1]: anacron.service:
> > > > > Deactivated
> > > > > successfully.
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:08 main-desktop kernel: [2945247.431492] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:14 main-desktop kernel: [2945253.154480] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > Aug 7 09:31:14 main-desktop kernel: [2945253.255401] CIFS:
> > > > > VFS:
> > > > > \\192.168.0.4 RFC 1002 unknown response type 0xfe
> > > > > e
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 11:16 +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7. Aug 2023, at 11:12, Michelle
> > > > > > > <michelle at msknight.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Toomas,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll update both servers and run more tests.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michelle.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For SMB, uid/gid sync is not important, you will access the
> > > > > > share
> > > > > > with authenticated user (or guest).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With NFS auth sys mechanism, the usernames and uid/gid need
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > match,
> > > > > > and your nfsv4_domain should match with client system
> > > > > > setting
> > > > > > (or
> > > > > > your access will be mapped to user ’nobody’).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > rgds,
> > > > > > toomas
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 10:56 +0300, Toomas Soome via
> > > > > > > openindiana-
> > > > > > > discuss
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 7. Aug 2023, at 09:21, Michelle
> > > > > > > > > <michelle at msknight.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > OI server is at...
> > > > > > > > > OpenIndiana Hipster 2022.10 (powered by
> > > > > > > > > illumos)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please run ‘pkg update’. We have had many updates since
> > > > > > > > 2022.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Client is Linux Mint...
> > > > > > > > > Distributor ID: Linuxmint
> > > > > > > > > Description: Linux Mint 21
> > > > > > > > > Release: 21
> > > > > > > > > Codename: vanessa
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm continuing to have problems with SMB shares. Even
> > > > > > > > > mounting
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > cache...
> > > > > > > > > sudo mount //192.168.0.2/jaguar /mnt/jaguar -o
> > > > > > > > > username=michelle,password=password,file_mode=0777,di
> > > > > > > > > r_mo
> > > > > > > > > de
> > > > > > > > > =077
> > > > > > > > > 7,ca
> > > > > > > > > che=
> > > > > > > > > none
> > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > //192.168.0.2/jaguar on /mnt/jaguar type cifs
> > > > > > > > > (rw,relatime,vers=3.0,cache=none,username=michelle,ui
> > > > > > > > > d=0,
> > > > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > forc
> > > > > > > > > euid
> > > > > > > > > ,gid
> > > > > > > > > =0,noforcegid,addr=192.168.0.2,file_mode=0777,dir_mod
> > > > > > > > > e=07
> > > > > > > > > 77
> > > > > > > > > ,sof
> > > > > > > > > t,no
> > > > > > > > > unix
> > > > > > > > > ,mapposix,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,bsize=1048576,echo_
> > > > > > > > > inte
> > > > > > > > > rv
> > > > > > > > > al=6
> > > > > > > > > 0,ac
> > > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > o=1)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > (for info, the UID of michelle is the same on client
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > server)
> > > > > > > > > ...I'm getting, "resource unavailable," on various
> > > > > > > > > read-
> > > > > > > > > write/rename
> > > > > > > > > operations including deleting files. Say, sixty
> > > > > > > > > files,
> > > > > > > > > three
> > > > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > fail
> > > > > > > > > to delete giving "resource unavailable" and then I
> > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > delete
> > > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > again, and they'll go.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > When the Linux client hits resource unavaialble,
> > > > > > > > > there's
> > > > > > > > > nothing in
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Linux messages and nothing in the OI
> > > > > > > > > /var/adm/messages
> > > > > > > > > either,
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > gives a hint of what's going on.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Having hit a brick wall with CIFS, I'm trying to
> > > > > > > > > configure
> > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > NFS
> > > > > > > > > share
> > > > > > > > > against user rather than machine IP, but I'm getting
> > > > > > > > > nowhere.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > zfs set sharenfs='rw=.:michelle' panther
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > access list used with rw does not allow to set per user
> > > > > > > > access,
> > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > share_nfs(8). It should interpret michelle as hostname,
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > I’m
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > sure why it will complain about invalid option below.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > cannot set property for 'panther': 'sharenfs' cannot
> > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > set
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > invalid
> > > > > > > > > options
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm tying myself in knots because it seems that
> > > > > > > > > there's
> > > > > > > > > "legacy"
> > > > > > > > > NFS,
> > > > > > > > > ZFS NFS with different options/restrictions and I'm
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > sure
> > > > > > > > > where
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > go. If I read correctly, only ZFS NFS is installed by
> > > > > > > > > "default"
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > new OI installation, but I'm not about to start going
> > > > > > > > > installing
> > > > > > > > > stuff
> > > > > > > > > until I have a better idea what I'm doing.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > One reason I set some shares against user permissions
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > protect
> > > > > > > > > against ransomware. I unmount and re-mount rw when I
> > > > > > > > > want
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > write
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > them, hence pure hostip is a problem for me.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I don't know where I'm looking for either option.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hence the decision to look to NFS (which I've never
> > > > > > > > > really
> > > > > > > > > had
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > handle before) and I'm hitting trouble there.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Grateful for thoughts and advice.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Michelle.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > zfs sharenfs is just one possible way to implement
> > > > > > > > sharing,
> > > > > > > > it is
> > > > > > > > more useful when you are switching pools between
> > > > > > > > different
> > > > > > > > machines -
> > > > > > > > so you would get sharing options with pool and do not
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > transfer /etc/dfs/dfstab between the systems.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For debugging, I suggest to test with command ’share’
> > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > sure your svc:/network/nfs/server:default is online,
> > > > > > > > then
> > > > > > > > use
> > > > > > > > share
> > > > > > > > command to test the options for specific share. Once
> > > > > > > > happy,
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > use either /etc/dfs/dfstab or zfs sharenfs (if you
> > > > > > > > still do
> > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > error, please report the bug in
> > > > > > > > https://www.illumos.org/issues/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And please do keep the system up to date, so we know
> > > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > expect -
> > > > > > > > we only do rolling updates and we are not patching old
> > > > > > > > versions.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > rgds,
> > > > > > > > toomas
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > > > > > > > openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> > > > > > > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > > openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
More information about the openindiana-discuss
mailing list