[OpenIndiana-discuss] login issue since upgrade to illumos-5c4a5fe167

[Marcel Telka]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:03:07PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 9:46 PM Marcel Telka <marcel at telka.sk> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 2:22 PM Marcel Telka <marcel at telka.sk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 12:47:00PM +0100, russell wrote:
> > > > > Is anyone else experiencing a similar problem?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, reported on IRC.
> > >
> > > One problem appears to be that the two files
> > >
> > > /usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> > > /usr/lib/amd64/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> > >
> > > are empty.
> > >
> > > There are a number of recent commits in this area, but it looks like
> > > something isn't triggering the recreation of those cache files correctly.
> >
> > Yes, we had that problem for several days between Oct 4th and Oct 7th,
> > but this issue should be already solved.  Hence my request (below) for
> > the pkg list -u output.  Especially because the illumos-5c4a5fe167 was
> > merged to illumos-gate on Oct 15th so my expectation is that such a
> > system is already fixed.  If this problem happens with the up-to-date
> > system then I'm really interested in details and more info.
> >
> 
> Copying from IRC:
> 
>    1 -r--r--r--   1 root     bin            0 Oct 18 21:12
> /mnt//usr/lib/amd64/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
>    1 -r--r--r--   1 root     bin            0 Oct 18 21:12
> /mnt/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
> 
> so, I"'m looking at
> /var/svc/log/application-desktop-cache-pixbuf-loaders-installer:default.log
> the log seems a bit mangled, but it says, at some point:
> gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders not installed
> 
> Apparently, deleting the empty cache files and rerunning the service does
> the right
> thing.

svcadm refresh svc:/application/desktop-cache/pixbuf-loaders-installer:default

should do the same.

> One other thing that occurs to me: does OpenIndiana still run a find to see
> if the
> cache needs to be regenerated due to new loaders? I largely removed all
> that logic
> because (a) it was quicker to refresh the caches than work out if it was
> necessary,
> and (b) it was susceptible to timestamps getting out of whack.

I'm thinking about doing this as well for OI.

-- 
+-------------------------------------------+
| Marcel Telka   e-mail:   marcel at telka.sk  |
|                homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
+-------------------------------------------+