[OpenIndiana-discuss] btop illumos/OpenIndiana port — PR up, looking for testers

[Peter Tribble]

Alex,

Tested on Tribblix, and Solaris 11 SPARC, and is working fine for me.

Thanks again,

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 11:10 AM Alex Gorouvein <agorouvein at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> All four points fixed and pushed to GitHub:
>
> - CPU panel on SPARC: was probing kstat instances 0..N-1 by number,
> assuming contiguous zero-based ids. Now walks the live kstat chain instead,
> so it doesn't matter what range the ids fall in.
> - fs/sys/buf.h collision: alias renamed to btop_fs.
> - find/getconf NPROCESSORS_ONLN: source discovery now uses Make's built-in
> $(wildcard ...) instead of find; thread count tries psrinfo first, getconf
> as fallback.
> - -static-libstdc++: no longer forced, only added for the Solaris 10
> cross-build (S10=true).
>
> Tested on an OpenIndiana VM and Solaris 10 x86 VM so far; still need to
> re-run this batch on bare metal, an old Acer laptop with OI, which I'll get
> to shortly. Please let me know how it goes on your SPARC machines.
>
> Thanks again for the testing.
>
> Alex
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026, 2:07 p.m. Peter Tribble <peter.tribble at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Alex,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 6:51 PM Alex Gorouvein <agorouvein at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you for clarification, Peter. I will ensure my next patch
> > > incorporates this and the three previously mentioned issues.
> >
> > Thanks for all the work you're putting in here.
> >
> > > Just curious, which SPARC machine do you have? Many years ago I had a
> > > headless SS5.
> >
> > The machine I tested was a T8-1 (64x 5GHz SPARC-M8 CPUs) running Solaris
> > 11.4,
> > it's in the gcc compile farm so is always running which makes it
> > useful for quick tests.
> > I have a T4-1 and some T5140s at home, which run for a few hours a week.
> >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 5:12 AM Peter Tribble <peter.tribble at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the fixes!
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 2:15 AM Alex Gorouvein <agorouvein at gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On the blank CPU panel on SPARC — I don't have SPARC hardware to test
> > > > > against, so if you get a chance, `kstat -p cpu_stat:0` on that
> > machine
> > > > > would help me see whether the counter names or layout differ from
> > what
> > > > the
> > > > > collector expects.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, I see the problem. There isn't a cpu 0. That's true in general -
> > the
> > > > cpu id
> > > > doesn't have to start at 0, and the list doesn't have to be
> > > > contiguous. Especially
> > > > on SPARC, where the cpu id comes from system topology rather than being
> > > > simply enumerated. On this system, the id is the range 64-127. So the
> > logic
> > > > that loops over 0-63 misses everything.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -Peter Tribble
> > > > https://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - https://ptribble.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > > > openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> > > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > > openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Peter Tribble
> > https://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - https://ptribble.blogspot.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



-- 
-Peter Tribble
https://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - https://ptribble.blogspot.com/