[oi-dev] Weekly Meeting on Tuesday Jan 3rd at 19:00 UTC
ikozhukhov at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 18:39:27 UTC 2011
I think - the best idea - to have one commit for one component with bug in
Large commit with multiply components will be hardly for review.
On 12/21/11 10:20 PM, "Bayard G. Bell" <buffer.g.overflow at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 20:09 +0400, Igor Kozhukhov wrote:
>> Additional comments:
>> 1. We will integrate new changes only with GCC4 build.
>> 2. For integration from oracle userland - we will open issue for it and
>> set priority - for good understanding what we need integrate first.
>> 3. For other integrations - open issue by integration person and commit
>> changes with integration process.
>I think these are reasonable suggestions for us to settle at the next
>two meetings, although we might need to improv on the second for the
>work you're doing.
>I think the consensus from the last meeting is that we need to break
>down large syncs into multiple changesets, which would (at least
>loosely) imply multiple issues. Since you've put your hand up to do the
>work, I suppose the question is whether you think you'll be submitting
>changes before returning from the holidays around Jan. 10. If you think
>you'll be done sooner rather than later, maybe the better way to keep
>things moving is to do the sync, send out the preliminary changeset and
>agree how to slice it up as a one-off once we know how it looks.
>Otherwise we can try to settle on a rule of thumb while the work is
>still pending. Does that make sense?
>oi-dev mailing list
>oi-dev at openindiana.org
More information about the oi-dev