[OpenIndiana-discuss] VirtualBox
Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Wed Dec 12 02:05:16 UTC 2018
That looks a lot like the panic we get on Solaris when someone tries to
run VirtualBox with SMAP enabled, and https://www.illumos.org/issues/6919
and https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/7.2+VirtualBox bot suggest OI may have
the same problem.
-alan-
On 12/ 9/18 11:38 AM, Till Wegmüller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for that work guys. Unfortunately I does not work for me.
> My System Panics.
> I updated to the latest release this morning and still get panics every
> time I want to boot a VM.
>
> Does anybody know a thing I am missing or should I open a bug report?
>
> MDB output:
> sudo mdb vmcore.1
> Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac cpu.generic uppc apix
> scsi_vhci zfs sata ip hook neti sockfs arp usba xhci mm fctl stmf
> stmf_sbd lofs random sd idm cpc crypto fcip fcp ufs logindmux nsmb ptm
> smbsrv nfs sppp ipc ]
>> $C
> ffffff003e31ba00 0xfffffffff8d72b66()
> ffffff003e31ba70 0xfffffffff8d6ddd4()
> ffffff003e31ba90 0xfffffffff8d6e5c5()
> ffffff003e31bb30 0xfffffffff8e0e1a6()
> ffffff003e31bbb0 0xfffffffff8d6f1d7()
> ffffff003e31bc30 supdrvIOCtl+0x148a()
> ffffff003e31bcc0 VBoxDrvSolarisIOCtl+0x361()
> ffffff003e31bd00 cdev_ioctl+0x39(13200000000, c0185687,
> fffffd7fec8ced50, 202003, ffffff0d2200f0f8, ffffff003e31bea8)
> ffffff003e31bd50 spec_ioctl+0x60(ffffff0d20eeec00, c0185687,
> fffffd7fec8ced50, 202003, ffffff0d2200f0f8, ffffff003e31bea8, 0)
> ffffff003e31bde0 fop_ioctl+0x55(ffffff0d20eeec00, c0185687,
> fffffd7fec8ced50, 202003, ffffff0d2200f0f8, ffffff003e31bea8, 0)
> ffffff003e31bf00 ioctl+0x9b(15, ffffffffc0185687, fffffd7fec8ced50)
> ffffff003e31bf10 sys_syscall+0x177()
>> ::status
> debugging crash dump vmcore.1 (64-bit) from Hephaistos
> operating system: 5.11 illumos-863275a46b (i86pc)
> image uuid: db6faf9c-3db4-ca4b-d83a-960dbb5e6e16
> panic message: BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ffffff003e31b8e0
> addr=fffffd7feba20640 occurred in module "<unknown>" due to an illegal
> access to a user address
> dump content: kernel pages only
>>
>
> Tanks for any advice
> Toast.
>
> On 12/07/18 07:10 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
>> I was just told there is now a vbox package for omnios.
>>
>> That is awesome news and kudos to the Omnios and OI community for
>> getting vbox to work on illumos.
>>
>>
>> On 2018-12-07 9:31 a.m., Geoff Nordli wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Any ideas on how I could convert the OI package to install on
>>> Omnios? I know the GUI part won't work. I am just looking for the
>>> command line part.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Geoff
>>>
>>> On 2018-12-06 10:11 a.m., Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello.
>>>> VirtualBox 5.2.22 is available from /hipster repository as
>>>> system/virtualbox .
>>>> GUI works as expected.
>>>>
>>>> The package is installable in zone, but is not tested there and
>>>> likely additional work is needed to make it functioning in NGZ.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> С уважением,
>>>> Александр Пыхалов,
>>>> программист отдела телекоммуникационной инфраструктуры
>>>> управления информационно-коммуникационной инфраструктуры ЮФУ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> От: Stephan Althaus <Stephan.Althaus at Duedinghausen.eu>
>>>> Отправлено: 18 ноября 2018 г. 23:47:03
>>>> Кому: openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>>> Тема: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] VirtualBox
>>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Just to confirm the current state,
>>>>
>>>> We are able to run VirtualBox virtual machines as user in Background by
>>>> this:
>>>> VBoxHeadless -s <vmName>
>>>> and use the graphical frontend via RDP for example or SSH dependant of
>>>> the guest OS,
>>>> save the current state of the VM to disk with
>>>> VBoxManage controlvm <vmName> savestate
>>>> as i am used to do with closing the virtualbox GUI
>>>>
>>>> I tested one existing Win XP VM and one existent VM with recent Debian
>>>> guest OS
>>>>
>>>> if you like to see the gui do "sudo 'VirtualBox' " and a "machine->add"
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for your work, Aurélien
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Stephan
>>>>
>>>> On 17.11.18 07:24, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
>>>>> To be clear, Virtualbox's GUI does not run as non-root if hardening is
>>>>> enabled seemingly due to some loading security mechanism.
>>>>> The GUI runs as root.
>>>>> Headless runs as expected.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/16/18, Stephan Althaus <Stephan.Althaus at duedinghausen.eu> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Short story:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I managed to build VirtualBox successfully. The target system is on
>>>>>> SunOS dell 5.11 illumos-b75eb7e6b5 i86pc i386 i86pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VirtualBox does not run on my target machine complaining about
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ld.so.1: VirtualBox: fatal: libQt5XcbQpa.so.5: open failed: No such
>>>>>> file
>>>>>> or directory
>>>>>> ld.so.1: VirtualBox: fatal: relocation error: file
>>>>>> /usr/lib/qt/5.8/plugins/amd64/platforms/libqxcb.so: symbol
>>>>>> _ZN15QXcbIntegrationC1ERK11QStringListRiPPc: referenced symbol not
>>>>>> found
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will investigate further - tomorrow evening maybe..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LONG story
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My Package can be found and installed by doing this:
>>>>>> #pkg unset-publisher userland
>>>>>> #pkg set-publisher -g http://duedinghausen.eu:10000/userland userland
>>>>>> #pkg refresh
>>>>>> #pkg install
>>>>>> pkg://userland/system/virtualbox@5.2.22,5.11-2018.0.0.0:20181116T220242Z
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i tried and managed to get the sources of oi-userland virtualbox with
>>>>>> date 2018/11/13
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://codeload.github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/zip/e3d92fa79d298d84ba67a8b46c042a647841c6cb
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First error when building:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /tank/src/oi-userland/components/sysutils/virtualbox/build/amd64/src/VBox/Devices/Audio/DrvHostOSSAudio.cpp:22:27:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fatal error: sys/soundcard.h: No such file or directory
>>>>>> #include <sys/soundcard.h>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>> i installed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #pkg install pkg:/system/header/header-audio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to fix that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then, qt5 was not found. In the output i found a hint to do
>>>>>> source ./build/amd64/env.sh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, QT5 was still not found. The directory stated in the env.sh
>>>>>> was not
>>>>>> correct for my system.
>>>>>> The QT PATH in the Makefile was set to /usr/qt/5, i changed that to
>>>>>> /usr/lib/qt/5.8
>>>>>>
>>>>>> next missing packages:
>>>>>> #pkg install pkg:/system/header/header-usb
>>>>>> #pkg install pkg:/system/header/header-ugen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- maybe i forgot to gmake env-prep before this all..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, after install on the target system,
>>>>>> it does not run complaining about libQt5X11Extras.so.5
>>>>>> #pkg install qt5
>>>>>> :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>> Stephan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14.11.18 20:40, Till Wegmüller wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Tim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is quite hard to get to Feature parity with Virtualbox when it
>>>>>>> comes
>>>>>>> to Desktop Features. Both KVM and bHyve have traditionally been more
>>>>>>> used in the Server and Cloud Market. However I believe some
>>>>>>> workarounds
>>>>>>> can be made.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First Proper Graphics Integration. I have since long ago stopped
>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>> any Virtualmachine Console for something like daily work with a GUI
>>>>>>> (Windows) The Built in RDP Server available in almost any Windows
>>>>>>> Version is massively Powerfull and the FOSS Implementation xfreerdp
>>>>>>> works well for many Use cases. Including Clipbord sharing any much
>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>> Using the Virtual Machines Remote Desktop Capability is what you
>>>>>>> want in
>>>>>>> most cases.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RedHat tried to offer a competing Product to Microsofts RDP with
>>>>>>> Spice
>>>>>>> but did not succeed that much. And as is unfortunately common with
>>>>>>> RedHat Software it makes heavy use of Linux exclusive functionality.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both bHyve and QEMU use VNC as default. TigerVNC which we have
>>>>>>> packaged
>>>>>>> should allow for Good resolution and Clipboard Sharing. You may
>>>>>>> need the
>>>>>>> Virtio Windows Dirvers and the Quemu Guest Agent though. I would
>>>>>>> guess
>>>>>>> since Virtualbox also uses software on the Guest for this purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bHyve looks like to be a step Back when it comes to Desktop features.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As for Resolution. This depends very much on the Graphics device Qemu
>>>>>>> presents to the VM. We seem to have cirrus, qxl, vmware and std
>>>>>>> available. I believe std is vesa. At least qxl, cirrus and vmware
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> be able to support 1080p Dsktop resolutions. You will need to pass
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> correct -vga option when starting the VM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As for shared Folders. The situation seems a lot better here for both
>>>>>>> KVM and bHyve. Both Support virtio-9p aka VirtFS. Which has kernel
>>>>>>> drivers for at least Linux which can use the Filesystem as Root
>>>>>>> apparently. Unfortunatly Windows Driver Work is not yet that complete
>>>>>>> see [0]. But with some Poking of both the ReactOS and the virtio-win
>>>>>>> Community this will be the way to go for shared folders. What
>>>>>>> remains as
>>>>>>> a question is if we have virtio-9p support compiled with our
>>>>>>> version of
>>>>>>> Qemu as it is quite recent. See [1] for examples of usage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While finishing this mail I noticed the Features list on freerdp
>>>>>>> [2]. It
>>>>>>> has everything you wanted. Given the feature compiles in Illumos. I
>>>>>>> think the Quickest way to get to feature parity is using Windows RDP
>>>>>>> server and Freedrp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [0]
>>>>>>> https://github.com/virtio-win/kvm-guest-drivers-windows/issues/126
>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/wiki/CommandLineInterface
>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/wiki/CommandLineInterface
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Researching Greetings
>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>> On 11/14/18 07:37 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
>>>>>>>> In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] VirtualBox, Stephan Althaus
>>>>>>>> said...:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you are on OmniOs / Omniosce, you have Bhyve.
>>>>>>>>> You can use that instead of virtualbox.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With Openindiana, you could use QEMU-KVM as well..
>>>>>>>>> What are your personal reasons not to do so?
>>>>>>>> There was a thread a couple weeks ago where some people, myself
>>>>>>>> included,
>>>>>>>> posted some of the reasons why they had previously found VirtualBox
>>>>>>>> preferrable to KVM. The "feature parity" part of the thread kind of
>>>>>>>> starts with my post:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2018-October/022445.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> openindiana-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>>>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> openindiana-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> openindiana-discuss mailing list
>>>> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> openindiana-discuss mailing list
>>>> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>>>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openindiana-discuss mailing list
>> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss at openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
More information about the openindiana-discuss
mailing list